Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission <br />Meeting Date: 08/26/2021 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />6.1. <br />Title: <br />PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Request for a Variance to Utilize an Alternative Tree Inventory Technique for Trott <br />Brook North (Project No. 21-130); Case of Sotarra <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City received an application for a variance from Sotarra (the "Applicant") to utilize an alternative technique to <br />complete the required tree inventory for the Trott Brook North project. The project area is generally located west of <br />Nowthen Boulevard, south of 173rd Avenue, north of Trott Brook, and east of Variolite (the "Subject Property"). <br />Notification: <br />The City attempted to notify Property Owners, as reflected in the Anoka County Property Records, within 350 feet <br />of the Subject Property of the request. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Subject Property has approximately 124 developable acres and of that, approximately twenty-eight (28) acres <br />of trees. However, the tree coverage can be further broken down into about eleven acres of naturally occurring <br />woodlands and approximately seventeen (17) acres of planted/cultivated woodland. The Applicant would complete <br />a standard tree inventory within all of the naturally occurring woodland areas but has proposed utilizing a Fixed <br />Radius Plot (FRP) sampling technique within the 17 acres of planted woodland. <br />The FRP sampling technique is commonly used in the timber industry where trees are generally the same age, size, <br />species, and in the same or very similar growing conditions. Per the attached memorandum, the proposed FRP <br />sampling technique would only be utilized in an area where the trees were planted, rather than occurring naturally. <br />The FRP method would establish 1/10 acre plots within the roughly 17 acre planted area and all trees within that <br />plot would be surveyed. The results would be extrapolated out to the entire planted area to provide a per acre <br />relative basal area, relative species abundance, and relative health condition for the planted area stand of trees. <br />The Environmental Policy Board (EPB) has reviewed this request at both their June 28 and July 19 meetings. The <br />EPB originally sought more information to assess the accuracy of the sampling technique and wanted to better <br />understand the potential time savings this method would provide. Ultimately, the EPB supported this alternative <br />sampling technique within the planted areas due to the homogenous characteristics and the supporting studies <br />provided by the Applicant outlining the accuracy of this technique. However, the EPB also specifically noted that <br />this was unique due to planted woodlands (compared to the natural woodlands, which would have much greater <br />diversity in species, age, and size). <br />When contemplating a variance, a three (3) factor test must be applied to determine practical difficulties: <br />1. Reasonableness - The proposal is to utilize an alternative inventorying technique, not to eliminate the need to <br />do an inventory. Due to the composition of the planted woodland area (generally the same age, size, species, <br />and growing conditions), the FRP technique should provide a fairly accurate accounting of existing trees. <br />2. Uniqueness - The areas in which this request is applicable consist of a planted stand of coniferous trees. <br />These trees are generally the same age, size, and species, which is considerably different from a naturally <br />occurring woodland. <br />3. Essential Character - This alternative sampling technique will not have any bearing on the essential character <br />of the surrounding area. There will be persons on the ground collecting tree data (whether using the FRP <br />