Laserfiche WebLink
<br />were completed by the transcriptionist in an executive summary fashion, and the City Council <br />indicated that they would like to see more detailed comments. He noted City Staff requested that <br />the transcriptionist provide a more detailed summary of the minutes, which City Staff received and <br />is providing at tonight’s meeting. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated the more detailed version is longer than a summarized version, <br />but less detailed than a verbatim record. He added the more detailed the minutes are, the more <br />expensive the cost in terms of secretarial service. He noted the most efficient way has been to get <br />an executive summary, and if a City Councilmember has a concern or wants additional detail, they <br />would make corrections or statements when minutes are being approved. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated a detailed summary would be normal for a strategic planning <br />session, and that has been the City’s practice and policy. He added a verbatim record can also be <br />provided. He noted Councilmember Howell had some concerns about how this was portrayed in <br />the discussion. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked what the difference is in cost between executive summary and a detailed <br />summary. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Colleen Lasher stated a typical work session would be <br />approximately $181, and near verbatim is estimated at approximately $300. She added she would <br />want to confirm those numbers with the owner of the secretarial service. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell asked whether the audio recording could be uploaded and made available <br />to the general public. <br /> <br />IT Manager Jason Frederickson stated he is unsure whether audio is made available to be stored <br />forever. He added it would depend upon whether City Staff keeps the audio files. He noted he is <br />unsure of the cost of data storage through Logis. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Colleen Lasher stated data retention is guided by Statute. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell stated, at the Environmental Policy Board meeting, some members had <br />questions about the strategic plan, but information was not available. She noted City Staff had to <br />listen to the recording again, which is a waste of time. She added everything should be available <br />to the public for transparency purposes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell stated she would like the conversation between herself and <br />Councilmember Woestehoff to be transcribed verbatim. She added she takes issue with his <br />profiling of her which is racist, and he is pushing tenets of critical race theory that should be made <br />available to the public. She noted she was not comfortable with the abbreviated minutes because <br />they did not encapsulate the entire conversation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked whether the meeting recording could be made available to the <br />public. He added that would be his suggestion. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / July 27, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />