Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated existing regulations are just for dogs only. She added a <br />resident who owns more than 3 dogs must obtain a private kennel license. She asked whether <br />Councilmember Specht would like to change the existing Code or the proposed changes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht stated his preference would be to change them both to at least 10 <br />animals. He added this could otherwise be a problem for many residents. <br /> <br />Mayor Kunza asked whether a resident could obtain a variance if they wanted to have more <br />animals. Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated a Conditional Use Permit for a private kennel <br />license is required, with formal hearing before the Planning Commission and City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated there have been Code compliance cases where residents have had <br />more than 3 dogs that were harder to care for, and there was too much noise. He added this will <br />give the City a way to make sure that residents have the ability and space to take care of multiple <br />dogs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked what the process is for getting a kennel license, and whether there <br />are requirements and fees. Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated the resident would submit a formal <br />land use application to the City and public notice is sent to adjacent residents. She added a public <br />hearing will be held before the Planning Commission and formally approved by the City Council <br />via Resolution. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked whether there are State regulations for domestic animals. Senior <br />Planner McGuire Brigl stated she is not aware of any State regulations, and most enforcement falls <br />on the City Code. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma stated the City should have an adequate process if someone wants to have more <br />pets. He added situations can be addressed individually. He noted he would not be in favor of <br />changing that policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated, as part of this discussion, the process could be shortened so that <br />not every case would be required to come to the City for an appeal. She added she would support <br />that process. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated City Staff is open to the appeal option. She added the City <br />will be put in a difficult position if residents already have animals and then bring their appeal to <br />the City Council. She noted it would be preferable for residents to apply before they get their <br />animals. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Musgrove, seconded by Councilmember Heineman, to continue the <br />Public Hearing introducing Ordinance 21-11 amending Chapter 10 of the City Code including <br />Requirements for Keeping of Cats and Roosters to the Regular Council Meeting on August 10, <br />2021. <br /> <br />City Council / July 27, 2021 <br />Page 6 of 25 <br /> <br /> <br />