My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:09:16 AM
Creation date
9/17/2021 10:27:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/23/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Walker stated that all of the residents stated that they did not want smaller lots,but <br /> the Commission voted to allow the smaller lots to remain when it made its recommendation to the <br /> Council. He stated that the City Council was the voice that did not allow that change. <br /> Chairperson Bauer acknowledged that the Commission supported allowing smaller lots on the <br /> interior of the plat with 80 foot lots on the exterior. He noted that the current proposal meets the <br /> zoning and bulk zoning regulations. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked the consequences of denying a request that meets bulk standards <br /> and fall into the existing zoning. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that she is not an attorney, but if an application meets all the <br /> bulk standards, the Commission would be obligated to approve the request. She stated that if the <br /> request is not approved, the City would open itself up to liability. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy stated that the preliminary plat is based on the existing standards for this <br /> zoning area, which has been in place for well over ten years. He commented that he understands <br /> the concern about development next door to an area where residents have lived for many years. <br /> He stated that the statement within the Comprehensive Plan is an attempt to balance the rural <br /> character of the community with urban growth. He did not believe the Commission has an option <br /> to deny the request at this time. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that conditions of approval could be added, if desired. <br /> Commissioner Walker stated that if Ramsey keeps having urban growth in the rural part of <br /> Ramsey,there will no longer be a rural part of Ramsey. He stated that the City continues to shove <br /> urban developments into existing rural areas. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy commented that when he was young, he lived on a farm in Coon Rapids. <br /> He stated that the urban sprawl continues to expand, and the City can attempt to control that the <br /> best it can. <br /> Commissioner Walker stated that before he moved to Ramsey two years ago,he selected his home <br /> because of the statement in the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that if this development continues <br /> to happen in the rural areas, that statement is pointless. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy commented that this decision on the zoning happened over a decade ago. <br /> He stated that if Commissioner Walker wishes to make those types of decisions,he should become <br /> a part of the development of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Commissioner Walker noted that the Beatermans have lived in Ramsey since 1978 and asked if <br /> they were invited to be a part of the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning of the property. <br /> Chairperson Bauer commented that the Comprehensive Plan identifies properties as urban and <br /> rural. He stated that this area is identified as R-1, while other areas are proposed to remain rural. <br /> Planning Commission/August 26, 2021 <br /> Page 17 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.