My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:09:16 AM
Creation date
9/17/2021 10:27:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/23/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gengler asked why a basement conversion would not be allowed. <br /> Planning Technician McCann stated that if someone wanted to convert a basement there would <br /> not be a way for the City to monitor that. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that some people are doing that already. She noted that if <br /> there is access to that basement area from the front door, a kitchenette could be added and a <br /> secondary living space for a family member could be created. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy stated that he called some other communities to gather information. He <br /> stated that he spoke with Andover city staff and that city stated that they receive inquiries while <br /> they do not see many of those requests move forward. He noted that Nowthen and Anoka do not <br /> allow this type of activity and asked how many other communities actually allow this activity. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl provided information on the cities that were selected, noting that <br /> most were chosen because there was a connection to the city staff and the ordinances were known <br /> to work well. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked if there is a minimum lot size specified for other communities, <br /> noting that Andover requires 2.5 acres. <br /> Commissioner Peters stated that if his neighbor were putting up a yurt or tiny home on his property, <br /> which is an 80-foot-wide lot,he would be opposed to that as he would believe the lot is too small. <br /> He stated that if the property is larger and meets the criteria, he would not be opposed. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked what would be considered a reasonable sized lot. <br /> Commissioner Gengler stated that she does not believe a lot would need to be huge to have an <br /> accessory building. She stated that sheds are already allowed and therefore she does not believe <br /> it would need to be a huge property. She stated that she would be comfortable allowing it on an <br /> 80-foot-wide lot in the R-1 zone. <br /> Commissioner Walker stated that he would support a one-acre size,but also does not like excluding <br /> people from an opportunity to telling them to do on their own property. <br /> Chairperson Bauer stated that perhaps more information could be gained on what is allowed by <br /> other communities, such as minimum lot size and any issues they have experienced. <br /> Commissioner Walker commented that parking would be an issue on an 80-foot lot if there is an <br /> accessory dwelling structure. He stated that at least a half-acre or full acre lot would be needed in <br /> order to accommodate an accessory dwelling unit and parking. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that in order to maintain the character of a rural <br /> community, you would not want additional parking structures or driveways. She stated that staff <br /> believes that the property should still look like a single-family home. She noted that if there are <br /> Planning Commission/August 26, 2021 <br /> Page 19 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.