Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Walker stated that if the sign is going to be leased out, businesses in surrounding <br /> communities can advertise in Ramsey versus the actual Ramsey businesses. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff commented that the vendor did provide preferential pricing to <br /> Ramsey businesses, it would allow businesses from other communities to advertise as well. He <br /> stated that the lease period was proposed at 30 or 35 years and the company committed to <br /> maintaining the sign during that period. <br /> Chairperson Bauer commented that he did not believe the City could restrict businesses from other <br /> communities from advertising on the sign. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff noted that he found the proposed language in the previous vendor <br /> proposal which stated that 50 percent of advertising would be reserved for City messages and <br /> Ramsey businesses. <br /> Commissioner Peters asked if there is language related to election messaging. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff confirmed there are stipulations that would prevent certain content, <br /> such as adult and political. He stated that although he agrees with Commissioner Walker, noting <br /> that he does not like the City being the only beneficiary,this City land might be the opportunity to <br /> test this out. <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked if the language related to regulated content would be part of the lease or <br /> ordinance language. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff commented that he believed that language was within the lease but <br /> noted that the ordinance could also have language related to content. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy stated that he is also concerned with the number of signs and is <br /> disappointed that this will not result in consolidation. He stated that he does not support this type <br /> of sign, but if this moves forward he would like to see a restriction related to the size of the sign. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that the pending lease would have a sign slightly <br /> smaller than 700 square feet. She recommended the discussion focus on location,distance between <br /> signs, number of signs, and architectural standards. She noted that the size of the sign has already <br /> been set. <br /> Commissioner Anderson did not believe enough information has been provided. He stated that he <br /> would like information on placement, size, brightness, etc. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the discussion from the Commission could be forwarded <br /> to the Council, but he would not recommend that this goes forward to ordinance. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that distance, location, brightness, and size of the sign is <br /> included in the draft ordinance. <br /> Planning Commission/August 26, 2021 <br /> Page 23 of 26 <br />