Laserfiche WebLink
8-11 all would end up being deficient of the minimum required lot size of 0.25 acres. Lot sizes for these lots would <br /> range from 0.20 acres to 0.22 acres. It is worth noting that the proposed density transitioning corridor includes <br /> berming throughout much of it,which means that the corridor could be reduced to 35 feet(proposed as 45 feet). <br /> However,that would result in lot sizes of approximately 0.23-0.24 acres,which is just below the minimum <br /> threshold and thus,would still need a variance. As proposed, it appears that this provides more transitioning for the <br /> adjacent neighborhood,with negligible differences in lot sizes. <br /> When contemplating a variance, a three (3)factor test must be applied to determine practical difficulties: <br /> 1. Reasonableness -The project requires density transitioning and what is being proposed exceeds the minimum <br /> standard but results in multiple lots falling just shy of the minimum lot size. A slightly wider transitioning <br /> area seems like a reasonable trade-off for lot sizes that fall 0.05 to 0.03 acres short of the minimum required <br /> lot size of 0.25 acres. <br /> 2. Uniqueness -There is a large, linear wetland cutting across the southern portion of the Subject Property. As <br /> proposed,there are no impacts to this wetland. If the project is required to shift south and east to <br /> accommodate the minimum required width of the density transitioning corridor and meet the minimum lot <br /> size requirement, it would likely result in impacts to the wetland. <br /> 3. Essential Character-While the project itself will impact the essential character of the locale (converting <br /> agricultural land to housing),the reduced lot sizes should not for two primary reasons. First,there will be a <br /> 45 foot wide corridor with berming and landscaping throughout much of it, owned by the HOA(separate <br /> from the individual lot owners). Secondly,the proposed lots will still be 0.20 to 0.23 acres in size,which <br /> would not be noticeable to the general eye. <br /> Alternatives <br /> Alternative 1: Approve the requested variance to lot size. The proposal provides a slightly wider than required <br /> density transition corridor,which provides more separation for the existing, adjacent residential properties. The <br /> slightly deficient lots are not likely to be noticeable to the general eye. Staff is supportive of this alternative. <br /> Alternative 2: Do not approve the variance to lot size. This would require the reconfiguration of the preliminary plat <br /> to ensure that all lots meet the 0.25 acre threshold while still also meeting the minimum density transitioning <br /> standards along the north and west boundaries of the Subject Property. <br /> Funding Source: <br /> The Applicant is responsible for all costs associated with this request. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> Staff supports the request as it helps avoid potential impacts to a wetland complex on the Subject Property, creates <br /> a wider density transitioning corridor, and the resulting reduces lot sizes are are just slightly below the minimum <br /> area requirement. <br /> Action: <br /> Motion to adopt Resolution 421-273 granting a variance to minimum lot size for Lots 3-4 and 8-11, Block 1 of the <br /> proposed Lynwood Subdivision. <br /> Attachments <br /> Site Location Map <br /> Site Plan <br /> Lot Size Exhibit <br /> Resolution 421-273: Variancec <br /> Form Review <br />