Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #21-227 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR <br />A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY <br />EASEMENT AT 7474 163" AVENUE NW <br />WHEREAS, Manuel Cuevas, hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant," has requested an <br />Easement Encroachment Agreement to maintain an existing ten foot by twelve (10' x 12') detached <br />accessory structure (the "Structure") within a drainage and utility easement (the "Easement") on <br />the property legally described as follows: <br />Lot 15 Block 2 Sweetbay Ridge, Anoka County, Minnesota <br />(the "Subject Property"). <br />WHEREAS, the placement within the drainage and utility easement would require a <br />Variance and an Easement Encroachment Agreement, approved by the Planning Commission and <br />City Council, respectively; and <br />WHERAS, the Planning Commission met and held a duly noticed public hearing on July <br />22, 2021 and approved the Variance request; and <br />WHEREAS, the Applicant has a standard five (5') foot Drainage and Utility Easement in <br />the side yard; and <br />WHERAS, the City Council reviewed the request for an Easement Encroachment <br />Agreement on the Subject Property for the Structure during their regular meeting on August 10, <br />2021. <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1) That the Applicant can continue to maintain the Structure within the Easement contingent <br />upon: <br />a) The Applicant entering into an Easement Encroachment Agreement with the City <br />and recording said agreement against the Subject Property; and <br />b) Review and approval of the Easement Encroachment Agreement by the City Engineer <br />to ensure the Easement can still function as intended. <br />2) That the Applicant shall not further encroach on the Drainage and Utility Easement without <br />written consent from the City. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />