08/08/05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10. 12. 13. 16. 17. 18. 19. 2l. 22~ 71'hat currently, the Subject Property has 71% (seventy-one percent) impervious surface lot coverage and is considered legal non-conforming. That the proposed outdoor dining patio and additional off-street parking area would result in an impervious surface lot coverage calculation of 75% (seventy-five percent). That the 30% impervious surface restriction is designed to limit site runoff to the Rum Ri. ver. That currently, drainage from the site flows either to a regional treatment pond in Rivers Bend Park or along a ditchline adjacent to TH 47 to a storm sewer before discharging into the Rum River. That the current drainage patterns provide for some level of treatment before discharging into the Rum River. That the additional pavement will transmit an increased level of water to the river at a quicker rate than the current conditions. That additional landscaping, in the form of native trees and shrubs, Mil help off-set some o I" the runoff generated by the additional impervious area. That the proposed work does not require a permit from the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization. That the proposed improvements would result in twenty-one new parking stalls and 450 square feet of patio dining space. That similar variances have been granted in the past. That if granted, the variance will/will, not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is denied to other owners of lands, structures or buildings in the same district. That if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. That if granted, the variance will/will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the Ramsey Zoning Chapter or other property in the PUD Planned Unit Development District and the Wild and Scenic River Overlay District. That if granted, the variance will/will not substantially increase the congestion of public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially impair property values within the neighborhood. RESOLUTION #05-08- Page 2 of 3