|
a at gve dwelling units per acre.
<br /> ~ gallons per d ¥ ~ ~ ~roiect's recommenda'
<br /> ensities be,/ono u,~ ~,.] ~, ~cre do not
<br /> .- ~ Bye dwelling un~ y .... _ .... ~ta ~ate~
<br />
<br />g~gub~iShed mangscng~- u~F '
<br />
<br /> ' . lure and planmng, _~.. -Does sprawl Cos .
<br />Rrchttec ~ oe~henson, zu,~. _ .... ~o~rnal o~t~e ~-' , : . ; . -:.:;:,~ -~ ..'.
<br /> .... ~n&fld~~t~ Y ~ce~eTLo~- · .. _ ,, - .: .-., -/,
<br />
<br />U S. Envbonmental ~roteCt~on A~enc~ . ...< .... - ..
<br /> __,sma~rowtn ..... ~ean wate~ and orlnkmg~rf '"
<br /> ~w.epa.gu~ .... Aaenc~' zoo2, n,~ .... tsafewater/gaprepu
<br />
<br /> tnfrasuuctUre Gap ~.a,~ . --I H'ndb°°k of Recommenu~ ....
<br /> ologlcatSu~eV' Not,oho "_. .ovlpubslchapter~lCn~W ., -'
<br /> ~.5. Ge ... n ~va ~ab~e at water.us~
<br /> Acqu~sKIo · , .... ew ~eveto~ment an6
<br /> S~ViflgS was OBe
<br />
<br />~ion to z.7 million residents by 2020 and were
<br />compared against a t997 baseline approach
<br />that assumed no change in ~and development
<br />patterns or the management of natural
<br /> In both water demand and infra-
<br /> ~esources. quaii~/growth stratoS/was
<br /> structure cost, the
<br /> an improvement ever the c~rrent, co,Yen'
<br /> tlona~ aPgl°ach' development
<br /> E~v~sion utah 9m~°sed ~ou~
<br /> scenarios ~or the pro~ect, ~anging from ~ew-dem
<br /> sity, au~o.ofiented deve~apment to we~ cum'
<br /> ~act, tr~nsR, ofiented development. ~e sce-
<br /> nario with the greatest ~n{rasuuctu~e cost
<br />
<br /> would be walk, hie and
<br />growth on unused rand be
<br />transit-oriented' %n this scenario, there would
<br />more iht'ill and redevelopment and investments
<br />would be used to extend public transit systems
<br />and offer aRematNes to the automobile.
<br /> This scenario also was the most effective
<br /> cag~ta water demand.
<br /> in reducing per ' that ~er capita
<br /> Envision Utah study estimated
<br /> demand wouM decrease dmmaticatW as
<br /> water becomes more compact, from
<br /> development day at a densi~
<br /> approximateWz~° ~attons per roughW
<br /> of ~o ~we~in~ units pe~ ac~e to
<br />
<br /> and 59° (foreign).
<br />available for 565 [ti.SO ,
<br />{:armer, A~c?, ~y, ecutwe owectOr.~ltham R gtem
<br />~CP, Director of Research,
<br /> Zoning practice [ISSN t5~8-°~35~ ~s p~oduced at
<br /> ~im Sthwah ,~cv, an~ gichae~ Oa~idson,
<br /> APA. ' ' Oo/n~ck, ~egan LeWiS,
<br /> ~o;f~s ACP,Rebecc2 '
<br /> ~tc~, ~afVa Reporte[S; ~u~ie
<br /> ~. RosS~ A~c¢, Sarah K, wiebenSon,
<br /> quo Bergen Assis~snt ~d~tor; t~sa gs~ton Oes~gn
<br /> duction.
<br /> CogVd~ht ~oo5 D~ ~" .... '
<br /> AssociatiOn, ~22 5, ~ichigan Ave., Suite ~6oo,
<br /> Chi~B~o, ~L 6o6O3- The AmeriCan
<br /> Assod~t%o~ a%so has oj5ces at ~776
<br /> Ave. N.W., Washington, DC
<br /> ~ssaChusettS '
<br /> www. P~anning'°~g' th~s publication may
<br /> At/dghts reserved. No part of
<br /> meanS, etect~OniC o~ mechanical,
<br /> o~ bY any in{orm~t%on s~omge
<br /> copying' ~eco~ding, . -
<br /> and ~etriewa~ s~stem, without
<br /> ~rom the AmeriCan 9~anning AsSOdation.
<br /> printed on recycted 9ape~ mctudmg 5°
<br /> c{e~ ~ber and ~o% postConsumef waste.
<br />
<br />ZONiNGPRAC%ICE 5.05
<br />A~ERir..j~N pu%NNiNG ASSOC%A110~
<br />
<br />
<br />
|