Laserfiche WebLink
• Approve the CPA, but identify approximately 28 acres of land elsewhere to re -guide to High Density <br />Residential (HDR). <br />• Approve the CPA as requested. This would remove the City from the LCA program at this time. <br />• Do not support the CPA. This would keep the Subject Property guided as HDR, and would render the <br />proposed project ineligible, as it does not meet the required density (8-15 units per acre) for that designation. <br />Other Potential Sites for High Density Residential <br />Please note that some of these properties are privately owned and some are owned by the City. Staff has not vetted <br />these through the individual owners. <br />A few potential sites are in the attached presentation for Council review. If Council is supportive of a re -guidance <br />on one of the sites, Staff would propose to set up a meeting with the Property Owner (if possible) to talk through <br />request and process, and then follow the required public process. <br />The Comprehensive Plan Amendment could be approved contingent upon successful re -guidance of another 27.5 <br />(or more) acres elsewhere for High Density Residential, which would not delay the current process. <br />Follow Ups <br />• If the City is removed from the LCA Program, would any funding need to be refunded to the Metropolitan <br />Council? No. <br />• How is land in the COR guided? Land is guided in the COR based on the COR Subdistrict Map 6.2 <br />(ramsey.mn.us). The City is given "credit" towards affordable housing allocation (8+ units/acre) based on the <br />midpoint of the expected density range. (This is explained on Page 37 of the Comprehensive Plan here: <br />www.ci.ramsey.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/3915/Ramsey-2040-Comprehensive-Plan) <br />• How does the City get back into the LCA Program? By guiding land at sufficient densities for affordability, <br />and meeting all criteria set forth by the Metropolitan Council (e.g. passing a resolution that we support fair <br />housing). <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the Applicant's responsibility. <br />Recommendation: <br />The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. At the Council's <br />previous meeting, the Council generally supported the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and directed <br />Staff to identify other potential areas to be re -guided as High Density Residential. <br />Outcome/Action: <br />Motion to Adopt Resolution #21-229 approving the comprehensive plan amendment contingent upon successful <br />re -guidance of additional acreage at 8+ units/acre. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Aerial View of Property <br />Future Land Use Exhibit <br />Current Zoning Exhibit <br />Proposed Lot Configuration <br />Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Dated July 22, 2021 <br />Draft Presentation <br />Resolution 21-229 <br />Form Review <br />