My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Resolution - #05-08-254 - 08/09/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Resolutions
>
2005
>
Resolution - #05-08-254 - 08/09/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 2:30:24 PM
Creation date
8/10/2005 2:56:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions & Ordinances
Resolutions or Ordinances
Resolutions
Resolution or Ordinance Number
#05-08-254
Document Date
08/09/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
That copies of the Draft EAW were placed in the Technology and Science Library, the <br />I,cgislative Reference Library and the Anoka County Library-Rum River branch. <br /> <br />That thc deadline for comment on the EAW was July 20, 2005. <br /> <br />That the City received comments from five governmental agencies, Anoka Conservation <br />D/strict, Anoka County, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota Department of <br />Natural Resources, and Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />That thc City did not received any comments from the public regarding the Draft EAW. <br /> <br />That responses to the comments received are shown on Attachment A. <br /> <br />NOW TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />'l'hat thc Ramsey City Council, after review of the facts relating to the Development, the Draft <br />I';A W, and the responses to comments received has determined the following: <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />That the I2AW does properly address mandatory environmental review issues pertaining <br />to the proposed Brookfield Addition. <br />That the responses to comments received by Anoka Conservation District, Anoka County, <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, <br />and the Metropolitan Council do properly answer and address the issues raised in their <br />review of the Draft EAW. <br />That further environmental review is not needed for the proposed Brookfield Addition by <br />Oakwood Land Development. <br /> <br />Thc motion For the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />I'carson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Mayor ~l'homas Gamec <br />Councilmember David Elvig <br />C(mncilmcmber Alan Pearson <br />C()uncilmcmbcr Sarah Strommen <br />Councilmcmber Mary Jo Olson <br />Councilmcmber Todd Cook <br /> <br />and the I'ollowing voted against the same: <br /> <br />~()llC <br /> <br />and thc [bllowing abstained: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05-08-254 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.