My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 08/23/2021 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 08/23/2021 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:08:07 AM
Creation date
10/8/2021 8:46:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Special
Document Date
08/23/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Directors and Planning Directors who will take a first crack at a development agreement. He noted <br />it is important to have a City Attorney’s eyes on it eventually, but he would never discourage a <br />City from drafting ordinances and agreements. <br /> <br />Describe the most challenging municipal issue you have faced during your legal career? What <br />were the circumstances and what was the outcome? <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson stated he dealt with a personnel issue involving open meeting law that got very <br />contentious and lasted over 4 months. He added most people can work through differences, or <br />agree to disagree. He noted his role as City Attorney was to ensure that the City did not do anything <br />to get itself into trouble, and the outcome was okay in this case. <br /> <br />If you did not list a monthly retainer as an option, please indicate why not, and whether your firm <br />is open to such an agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson stated he did not list a monthly retainer, although his firm does have some retainers <br />with clients, and he is open to discussing it. He added it is difficult with new clients to come up <br />with a retainer number until it is determined how much work there will be. He noted he would <br />request that the City have a review after 6 months or a year for potential adjustment, to ensure that <br />the hours match the retainer. <br /> <br />Please describe all factors that you would consider in regard to advising the city on how to respond <br />to a Governor’s Executive Order. What options are available to a City Council if they disagree <br />with a Governor’s Executive Order? <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson stated many cities were navigating new situations during the pandemic with regard <br />to executive orders. He added it is important for cities to consider the legal authority of the <br />governor to enact the order and its underlying purpose, if they intend to disregard or not enforce <br />the order at City Hall. He noted Governor’s Orders are meant to regulate all cities, and it comes <br />down to what is practical and enforceable. <br /> <br />The City of Minneapolis has chosen not to enforce certain laws such as marijuana laws and <br />immigration laws, and recently schools in Texas have countermanded Executive Orders related to <br />school safety. How do these examples reinforce or contradict your stance on the last question <br />related to Executive Orders? <br /> <br />Mr. Anderson stated a number of factors go into making these kinds of decisions. He added <br />Minnesota cities can make legislative and policy decisions that are afforded immunity from <br />liability. He noted every situation is different, and there may be reasons for not enforcing a rule <br />or taking a different policy approach. <br /> <br />Under Minnesota Statute (216B.36), cities can impose a fee on utility companies that use the public <br />rights-of-way to deliver service. What advice or caution would you give the city in regard to the <br />use of franchise fees? <br /> <br />City Council Special Work Session / August 23, 2021 <br />Page 13 of 22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.