My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 08/23/2021 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 08/23/2021 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:08:07 AM
Creation date
10/8/2021 8:46:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Special
Document Date
08/23/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
quality work in a much shorter period of time by using standard contracts for staff. She noted her <br />firm is small but efficient, and they have the experience and backup if needed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked whether Ms. Schwarzhoff’s firm represents Elk River and Dayton, <br />two cities that are close neighbors of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Ms. Schwarzhoff stated her firm does not represent those cities as city attorney, but rather has done <br />legal work for them through the League of Minnesota Cities. She added her firm does not represent <br />any cities that share a border with Ramsey. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman asked whether there are any parallels between street fees and franchise <br />fees, and whether franchise fees could be challenged at that level. <br /> <br />Ms. Schwarzhoff stated franchise fees have a long history and are subject to different statutes and <br />rules. She added street fees are more of a development issue with a whole list of related fees <br />including trunk charges for water and sewer. She noted, even when street fees were being charged, <br />they were considered questionable due to a lack of obvious authority to charge them. <br /> <br />Ms. Schwarzhoff stated there has been a lot of push back from developers regarding fees and <br />requirements, which they say prevents affordable housing. She added she believes that to be <br />nonsense, but she is biased, and in most cases, the fees are related to what the City actually expends <br />for services. <br /> <br />COUNCIL DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma requested a recap from the Councilmembers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht stated he liked Mr. Knaak, who had the side of experience and a smaller <br />firm, as well as more access for the City Council. He added he felt like some of the others were <br />too big. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma stated he has no problems with the current attorneys. He added he really liked Ms. <br />thth <br />Whitmore of Eckberg Lammers, even though she danced around the 7 and 8 questions. He <br />added he felt that Mr. Knaak’s firm was too small. He noted Kennedy Graven would be okay, but <br />their firm is very large, and Hoff Barry would be okay too. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated he did not care for Kennedy Graven as they are a big firm and the <br />attorney is fairly new, backed up by an even newer attorney. He added he also did not like Ms. <br />Whitmore from Eckberg Lammers, as she talked a lot and had broad experience, but no expertise. <br />He noted Mr. Langel scored highest with him, along with Ms. Schwarzhoff, who was very <br />knowledgeable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated he did not get a strong impression of Mr. Knaak, although he made <br />it clear he wants to work with Ramsey. He added he would need to hear more from Mr. Knaak. <br /> <br />City Council Special Work Session / August 23, 2021 <br />Page 17 of 22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.