Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Langel stated it depends on the nature of the Executive Order, which is based in State statute, <br />granting the Governor broad authority with respect to emergency authority. He added a review of <br />other Executive Orders gives a good idea of where the State stands in terms of their authority, and <br />the City’s authority, and potential impacts to the City. He noted cities have passed Resolutions <br />expressing disagreement with Executive Orders. He stressed the importance of ensuring that the <br />City does not get into potential legal difficulties based on a disagreement with an Executive Order. <br /> <br />The City of Minneapolis has chosen not to enforce certain laws such as marijuana laws and <br />immigration laws, and recently schools in Texas have countermanded Executive Orders related to <br />school safety. How do these examples reinforce or contradict your stance on the last question <br />related to Executive Orders? <br /> <br />Mr. Langel stated it is his understanding that Minneapolis prosecutors have chosen not to force <br />certain laws and that is persecutorial discretion, which does not have an impact on the law itself <br />th <br />which still exists and is valid. He added, regarding immigration law, that is a 10 Amendment <br />issue, and the feds cannot force local governments to assist them in enforcing federal law. He <br />noted Minneapolis has instructed City employees not to cooperate with federal officers in <br />enforcing immigration laws, and they have the right to do that. <br /> <br />Mr. Schafer stated, with regard to the issue in Texas, he works with many School Districts, and <br />they can be in a precarious situation with these types of decisions and could risk losing their <br />funding. He added there may be requirements attached to a source of funding. <br /> <br />Under Minnesota Statute (216B.36), cities can impose a fee on utility companies that use the public <br />rights-of-way to deliver service. What advice or caution would you give the city in regard to the <br />use of franchise fees? <br /> <br />Mr. Langel stated franchise fees can be contentious, although some cities find that they are a <br />straightforward funding mechanism to raise funds for roads or building improvement purposes. <br />He added there are arguments that it is an unfair tax that hits certain demographics harder than <br />others and is not appropriate, but those are policy issues. He noted, from his perspective, this is a <br />matter of knowing what arguments are out there and having a policy discussion at the City Council <br />level. <br /> <br />Mr. Langel stated there are other ways besides the franchise fee to find money for roads, including <br />raising taxes. He added the role of the City Attorney is to frame it in terms of legal requirements. <br />He reiterated it is a policy issue. <br /> <br />How would you describe the role and relationship the City Attorney has with individual City <br />Council Members? <br /> <br />Mr. Langel stated the City Attorney should respond to communications from the City Council and <br />City Staff as quickly as possible. He added they do not get much communication directly from <br />the City Council, as most contact is through City Staff. He noted Councilmembers have very <br />limited individual authority, and the City Council acts as a group to direct the City Attorney’s <br />actions. <br />City Council Special Work Session / August 23, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 22 <br /> <br />