Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The developer stated the 65-foot-wide lots are a result of working with a challenging and difficult <br />site. He added the property is guided for high density residential, which is a more intense use. He <br />noted the rest of the site could be apartments or condos, and potentially a few more residential <br />properties along the north and west, since the density will not be as high as it is currently zoned <br />for. <br /> <br />The developer stated transition and buffer areas along the home sites is designed to meet the intent <br />of the density transitioning Ordinance, including berms and landscaping. He added this is an <br />important aspect of the development of this parcel, as it will be difficult to sell competitively priced <br />single-family homes on larger lots in an area surrounded by townhomes. He noted the most logical <br />solution would be units on 60-foot-wide lots with density that is similar to the surrounding <br />townhomes. <br /> <br />The developer noted that the single-family homes will be built near the fire station, which is not <br />typically as desirable for single family buyers, especially for 80-foot lots. He added the plan is to <br />have transitional townhomes to the north with a significant buffer and screening from detached <br />single-family homes. <br /> <br />The developer stated the homeowner to the west provided feedback at the Planning Commission <br />meeting, and he was okay with 65-foot-wide sites. He added Tom Dean to the north is also <br />amenable to 65-foot widths. He noted this type of development is very popular in the real estate <br />market right now, and hopefully the details can be worked through, so it meets other aspects of the <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked whether any lots would be 80-feet wide. <br /> <br />The developer stated the intention is to have 65-feet wide lots on the north and west, and the rest <br />would be attached townhomes. He added lots 1-18 are 65-foot-wide home sites, with townhomes <br />and attached single family homes further south. He added the density transitioning Ordinance <br />would be taken into consideration with 45 feet of buffering zone. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked whether all the lots could be 65-foot-wide single-family lots. <br /> <br />The developer stated a need for townhomes has been identified in today’s market in Ramsey. He <br />added townhomes are very popular as they are maintained by an association but still have home <br />ownership value and are more affordable than a detached home. He noted attached townhomes <br />fulfill the City’s Comprehensive Plan guidance for providing a range of housing for a variety of <br />ages and incomes. <br /> <br />The developer stated the single-family units to the north are included because they are cognizant <br />that there are larger existing homes to the north and west. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked whether the developer would do 80-foot-wide lots on the north <br />and west boundaries. He asked whether there is a secondary entrance from Armstrong Boulevard. <br /> <br />City Council / August 24, 2021 <br />Page 10 of 14 <br /> <br />