My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/28/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 09/28/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:14:00 PM
Creation date
10/8/2021 9:16:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/28/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
754
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove commented that in terms of the equipment, there should also be a <br />column for the employee costs/equipment. <br />Councilmember Specht stated that he agrees that there should be an equipment section that outlines <br />the different needs and that employees should be responsible for any other equipment that they <br />would need in order to complete their job from home. He stated that the needs would be different <br />for different employees and what they need to effectively complete their job from home. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked if the City currently provides a stipend to employees for home <br />internet. <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied that the City does not. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked if legal counsel has been engaged to determine if there would <br />be risk to having a telecommuting policy that relies on an employee providing their own internet <br />service. He stated that he would imagine that many of these things are covered in other policies. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if reference should be made to those other policies. <br />Councilmember Specht stated that perhaps providing a stipend for internet service could be part <br />of negotiations to persuade people to work from home. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that would be an incentive if the City were asking people to work <br />from home, but this policy is providing an allowance for something the employees are asking for. <br />Councilmember Heineman asked if there was a cost to transitioning to virtual work during the past <br />year. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill confirmed that there were some expenses to making that <br />transition to allow people to work from home during COVID, but those costs were covered by the <br />CARES Act. He stated that any future costs would be much less because not all employees would <br />request to telecommute and different decisions could be made, noting that perhaps an employee <br />that telecommutes uses just a laptop instead of a laptop and desktop. <br />Councilmember Heineman commented that he would believe the decision should be left to the <br />discretion of the manager as to whether an employee could work remotely based on their scope of <br />work. He stated that he would suggest equipment being part of union negotiations. He stated that <br />if an employee has the equipment, he would fine with allowing someone to work remotely if the <br />manager agreed. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that in terms of data practice and security, he would highly <br />recommend that the City provide the equipment. He stated that there are a lot of bad things going <br />around in terms of cyber security and therefore would want to ensure the City remains as protected <br />as possible. He stated that perhaps the IT policy encourages a laptop first policy as that equipment <br />is portable. <br />City Council Special Work Session / June 15, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.