My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/28/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 09/28/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:14:00 PM
Creation date
10/8/2021 9:16:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/28/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
754
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Front Setback <br />30 feet <br />25 feet <br />L <br />Side Setback <br />rSide (Corner) Setback 1 <br />r <br />5 feet <br />30 feet <br />10 feet <br />15 feet <br />Rear Setback 30 feet l 30 feet I <br />* If the density transitioning area is platted as an outlot (recommended by Staff), some of the lots would drop below the 0.25 <br />acre threshold (lot sizes for six of the proposed lots would be 0.20 to 0.22 acres in size). <br />1 Does not appear to impact any lots (no corner lots proposed), but the standard should still be updated to reflect the actual <br />requirement. <br />The Planning Commission is conducting a Public Hearing on September 23, 2021, to consider a variance to lot size for the six <br />(6) lots that, as a result of creating a separate outlot for the density transitioning area, would drop below the minimum lot area <br />threshold. Staff will provide a verbal update to City Council regarding the outcome of that request. <br />Attached Townhomes <br />The table below outlines the proposed bulk standards and the minimum requirements for the R-2 Residential (Medium Density) <br />District. <br />Standard <br />[_Setback from Private Road and Public Road Right -of -Way <br />7 Setback from Exterior Development Boundary <br />Building to Building Setback <br />R-2 Residential (Medium Density) <br />25 feet <br />30 feet <br />20 feet <br />Proposed <br />25 feet <br />30 feet <br />25 feet <br />Streets and Access <br />The original Sketch Plan proposed a single, long (-2,100 feet) cul-de-sac to service this entire subdivision. Based on feedback <br />from Staff and the Planning Commission, the Applicant revised the layout to eliminate the cul-de-sac and incorporate a second <br />access onto Armstrong Boulevard. The proposed second access does not meet current spacing guidelines for a County <br />Highway; however, Anoka County Highway staff acknowledged the City's concerns about a single point of access serving this <br />many homes and have noted they think a solution can be found. They did state that any potential second access would need to <br />be a right in, right out only and must include a triangular, raised concrete median (pork chop) to reinforce the right in, right out <br />access, and would also require a right turn lane for southbound traffic on Armstrong Boulevard. The plan set has been <br />forwarded to the Anoka County Highway Department, but as of the writing of this case, no response has been received. <br />While Anoka County Highway has not provided formal approval, they are continuing to work with the City to find a safe <br />solution. Formal approval of the Preliminary Plat should to be contingent upon, among other things, County approval of a <br />second access onto Armstrong Boulevard. <br />The east -west road providing the second access to Armstrong Boulevard is proposed as a private street. Public Safety Staff <br />prefer to see this as a public street, which would assist in enforcement of no overnight parking. The Applicant agreed to widen <br />the street from twenty-four (24) feet to thirty (30) feet. However, they are opposed to providing the sixty (60) feet of <br />right-of-way required for a public street as it would likely eliminate two (2) buildings (a total of 10 units). The current proposal <br />is a thirty (30) foot wide private road that the Home Owners Association (HOA) would be responsible for maintenance and <br />plowing. <br />Density Transitioning <br />North and west of the Subject Property are existing residential lots zoned R-1 Residential (Rural Developing). Thus, density <br />transitioning is required along the common boundary line with the adjacent, impacted uses. While there are multiple options to <br />satisfy density transitioning, the Applicant is proposing to utilize landscaping to achieve compliance. <br />Per City Code Section 117-110 (Residential Development Transitioning), if landscaping is utilized, one of the following two <br />options must be implemented: <br />• Vegetative Buffer "C" - a minimum 45 feet in width in common ownership with the following planting schedule per 100 <br />feet of property boundary adjacent to impacted use: <br />• 8 overstory trees <br />• 8 evergreen trees <br />• 8 understory trees <br />• Vegetative Buffer "B" with a berm - a minimum 35 feet in width in common ownership with the following planting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.