Laserfiche WebLink
which falls short of the requirement. He stated that if a berm is added, that would take space from <br />the backyards of the residents. He commented that there are some fairly significant existing tree <br />lines to the north and west of the site. He stated that an adjacent property owner previously made <br />the comment that he would even support 65-foot lots, if properly screened. He noted that property <br />has a row of evergreens and suggested that perhaps a row of evergreens be added on this site to <br />increase the thickness of that screen. He stated that would meet the intent of screening without <br />reducing the backyard sizes. He stated that if home sites cannot be platted to the lot line, as shown, <br />it would create a challenge in having 80-foot lots. He commented that staff has been great to work <br />with throughout this process. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked the concern with the size of the 80-foot lots. <br />Mr. Tabone reviewed the depth that is needed in order to meet the 10,000 square feet lot size for <br />an 80-foot-wide lot. He noted that if the density transitioning corridor is required, that portion of <br />the site would be rendered undevelopable at 80 feet wide. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked if a variance could be issued for that section of the property related to <br />minimum lot size. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that a minimum lot size variance could be provided, <br />noting that would need to occur through separate action at a future meeting. <br />Kyle Swenson, 15049 Iguana Street, stated that this project seems to be a moving target as he has <br />had different layouts mailed to him. He stated that the original layout would have had four 65- <br />foot lots and three ponds that would come near his property but with the design change there would <br />be several more homes along the existing residential boundary. He stated that the solution would <br />be to include the buffer and remove a lot in order to have the minimum lot size met against that <br />existing residential property line. He stated that the existing residents want to see a transition as it <br />will be quite a difference to have 140 homes compared to the cornfield that exists. He stated that <br />he likes the 80-foot-wide lot requirement and would suggest the developer remove a few lots in <br />order to support that buffer. <br />Motion by Commissioner Peters, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to close the public hearing. <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />Commissioner Peters aye <br />Commissioner VanScoy aye <br />Commissioner Walker aye <br />Commissioner Gengler aye <br />Chairperson Bauer aye <br />Motion Carried. <br />Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 8:31 p.m. <br />