Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/12/2021

Home

September 10, 2021 Page 4 List of Figures Figure 1: Existing Mississippi River Crossings in the Northwest Twin Cities Metropolitan Area 6 Figure 2: Projected Increase in Households in Northwest Metro Cities 11 Figure 3: Future Land Use in the Northwest Metro 12 Figure 4: Future Vehicle Transportation Network in the Northwest Metro 13 Figure 5: Origin -Destination Analysis Summary of Trips Crossing the Mississippi River 15 Figure 6: Median and Range of Daily Trips on Northwest Metro Mississippi River Crossings 17 Figure 7: Origin and Destination of Trips Crossing the Mississippi River on Highway 101, by TAZ 19 Figure 8: Origin and Destination of Trips Crossing the Mississippi River on Highway 169, by TAZ 20 Figure 9: Origin and Destination of Trips Crossing the Mississippi River on Highway 610, by TAZ 21 Figure 10: Highway 101 Bridge Long -Distance Holiday Trips 22 Figure 11: Hours of Congestion on a Typical Workday 24 Figure 12: AM Peak Hour Congestion and Issues 26 Figure 13: PM Peak Hour Congestion and Issues 27 Figure 14: Highway 101 Mississippi River Crossing Congestion 29 Figure 15: Constructed and Programmed Projects -- 2021 31 Figure 16: Range of Possible Improvements on Highway Corridors in the Northwest Metro 32 Figure 17: Highway 10-A1: At -Grade Improvements 36 Figure 18: Highway 10-A2: Grade -Separated Corridor 37 Figure 19: Highway 10-A2: Lane Addition 38 Figure 20: Highway 101-A1: Diverging Diamond Conversion 39 Figure 21: Highway 101-A2: SB Highway 101 Flyover to EB I-94 40 Figure 22: Highway 610 — Al: Mobility Improvement 41 Figure 23: Planning -Level Capacity Needs for New River Crossing 42 Figure 24: Four -Lane Arterial Conceptual Section 43 Figure 25: Four -Lane Expressway Conceptual Section 43 Figure 26: Concept 1— Mobility Improvements on Highway 10 and Highway 101 45 Figure 27: Concept 2 — Mobility Improvements on Highway 10, Highway 101, and Highway 610 46 Figure 28: Concept 3 — Four -lane Arterial Following Zanzibar/Armstrong Alignment 47 Figure 29: Concept 4 — Four -lane Arterial Following Zanzibar/Armstrong Alignment 48 Figure 30: Year 2040 Traffic Volumes Under No -Build Scenario 51 Figure 31: Concept 1 Impacts on Regional Traffic Volumes 52 Figure 32: Concept 2 Impacts on Regional Traffic Volumes 53 Figure 33: Concept 3 Impacts on Regional Traffic Volumes 54 Figure 34: Concept 4 Impacts on Regional Traffic Volumes 55 Figure 35: Congestion 2018 vs 2040 No -Build (AM Peak) 56 Figure 36: I-94/Hwy 101 I nterchange 69 Figure 37: I-94/Hwy 101 I nterchange — Condition 1 (DDI) 70 Figure 38: I-94/Hwy 101 I nterchange — Condition 2 (Flyover) 70 Figure 39: I-94/Hwy 101 Intersection Delay; AM Peak Hour 71 Figure 40: I-94/Hwy 101 Intersection Delay; PM Peak Hour 71 Figure 41: I-94/Hwy 101 Intersection Delay with Increased Telecommuting; AM Peak Hour 72 Figure 42: I-94/Hwy 101 Intersection Delay with Increased Telecommuting; PM Peak Hour 72 Figure 43: I-94/Dayton Parkway Interchange 73 Figure 44: I-94/Dayton Parkway Intersection Delay; AM Peak Hour — Existing Geometry 74 Figure 45: I-94/Dayton Parkway Intersection Delay; PM Peak Hour — Existing Geometry 74 Figure 46: I-94/Dayton Parkway Intersection Delay; AM Peak Hour — Improved Geometry 75 Northwest Metro Mississippi River Crossing Feasibility Analysis