Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/12/2021

Home

September 11, 2021 Page 72 Intersection Delay Sensitivity Test Peak hour operational analysis was also conducted for the I-94/Highway 101 interchange using forecasts assuming increased telecommuting. The same methodology was used to calculate intersection delay under the telecommute forecast as under the forecast with traditional travel behavior assumptions. Figure 41 shows that AM peak hour intersection delay is similar under the traditional and telecommute forecasts, with slightly less intersection delay under the telecommute forecast and therefore less delay reduction benefit. PM peak hour intersection delay is shown in Figure 42. There is significantly less intersection delay under the telecommute no -build scenario than under the traditional no -build scenario. Figure 41: I-94/Hwy 101 Intersection Delay with Increased Telecommuting; AM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 111 37 11 2040 No Build - Traditional 2040 Concept 1 - Traditiona I 2040 Concept 2 - Traditiona I 2040 Concept 314 - Traditional 2040 No Build -Telecommute 2040 Concept 1- Telecommute 40 39 23 2040 Concept 2 - Telecommute 23 11 26 2040 Concept 314 - Telecom mute 38 11 24 11 28 31 16 0 50 34 13 • Diamond Lake Rd • North Ramp • South Ramp 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Intersection Delay (sec) Figure 42: I-94/Hwy 101 Intersection Delay with Increased Telecommuting; PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions 2040 No Build - Traditional 2040 Concept 1 - Traditiona 2040 Concept 2 - Traditiona I 2040 Concept 314 - Traditional 2040 No Build -Telecommute 2040 Concept 1 - Telecommute 2040 Concept 2 - Telecommute 2040 Concept 314 - Telecom mute 26 11 41 15 49 34 28 35 8Sair 24 100 20 • Diamond Lake Rd North Ramp South Rarnp 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Intersection Delay (sec) 16 17 152 is 14 110 32 12 46 31 27 31 15 15 Northwest Metro Mississippi River Crossing Feasibility Analysis