Laserfiche WebLink
September 11, 2021 <br />Page 76 <br />Intersection Delay Sensitivity Test <br />Peak hour operational analysis was also conducted for the I-94/Dayton Parkway interchange using <br />forecasts assuming increased telecommuting. The same methodology was used to calculate <br />intersection delay under the telecommute forecast as under the forecast with traditional travel <br />behavior assumptions. <br />AM peak hour intersection delay with existing geometry is shown in Figure 48 and PM peak hour <br />intersection delay with existing geometry is shown in Figure 49. These figures show that the existing <br />I-94/Dayton Parkway interchange will operate acceptably with or without a new river crossing <br />under scenarios with additional telecommuting. <br />Figure 48: I-94/Dayton Parkway Intersection Delay with Increased Telecommuting; AM Peak Hour - <br />Existing Geometry <br />Existing Conditions 10 13 24 <br />2040 No Build - Traditional 12 15 30 <br />2040 Concept 3 - Traditional 57 14 <br />2040 Concept 4 - Traditional <br />2040 No Build - Telecommute <br />2040 Concept 3/4 - Telecommute <br />• Brockton Ln <br />1-94 EB Rarnp <br />1-94 WB Ramp <br />CSAH 81 <br />91 <br />37 <br />64 <br />13 <br />114 <br />54 <br />0 <br />11 14 29 <br />111 23 34 <br />50 100 150 200 250 <br />Intersection Delay (sec) <br />Figure 49: I-94/Dayton Parkway Intersection Delay with Increased Telecommuting; PM Peak Hour - <br />Existing Geometry <br />Existing Conditions 7 11 25 <br />040 No Build -Traditional 9 17 32 <br />2040 Concept 3 - Traditional 42 12 96 38 <br />2040 Concept 4 - Traditional IM 44 13 105 41 <br />2040 No Build - Telecommute 35 8 13 29 <br />2040 Concept 3/4 - Telecom mute liffm 11 45 34 <br />• Brockton Ln <br />■ 1-94EBRamp <br />1-94 VVB Ramp <br />CSAH 81 <br />100 150 200 250 <br />Intersection Delay (sec) <br />Northwest Metro Mississippi River Crossing Feasibility Analysis <br />