|
r
<br />,.
<br />I
<br />•..... r'
<br />r
<br />r' ,l
<br />t''''.."' IF-‘1-,
<br />, .
<br />1 ti r 1 _T-1
<br />5
<br />r 1�r.171
<br />i i - Wj
<br />!i Li_i., 1
<br />—1.4' i • ' ,L)--1
<br />I I
<br />I '
<br />j
<br />_Cary er I ,
<br />7,_,..._,,_.) .,. .__ - - --,,,,
<br />____......____.•
<br />,...,,._„...-..,._,„
<br />\--,
<br />5r—I4 i„, r-,,, ___, r ___ i )
<br />1
<br />, ,__.-,
<br />1 , ..-....,, I
<br />;) c., --Scott 1 _ _ _ __�
<br />1w.
<br />E,&t
<br />effitl
<br />1
<br />I
<br />° City of Blaine
<br />T
<br />(1:7, /0110 7 /0187.6 /o) 5,228 - j
<br />k . TH�610 (1.9%12%196.1 %) ri
<br />4 - OMD AM(6-1(� ' B TH610: 20,863 1 ,.a I
<br />iri
<br />` I �. �r-
<br />,Je btll : -1 j
<br />j
<br />Top Cities Using SB TH610 Crossing: --
<br />1 1. Coon Rapids (27.6%)
<br />--r-- • 2. Blaine (23.7%) j
<br />3. Andover (10.4%)
<br />4. Anoka (2.7%)
<br />5. Ramsey (2.5%) r _ _ Ramsey
<br />oq__. I 1 Ramsey�County, I
<br />i 02.-'1: r 1 �`ii`464
<br />j
<br />-- -- ! (0.7,%13.3%196%) I
<br />Minne, poIi i .
<br />I
<br />Legend
<br />Current Crossings
<br />Heat Map (6-10am Trips/SqM)
<br />0-25
<br />25 - 50
<br />50 - 100
<br />100 - 200
<br />200 - 400
<br />x,xxx AM Trips Using SB Crossings
<br />TH1011US169\TH610
<br />(x%\x%\x%) % of AM trips using
<br />TH101\US169\TH610
<br />Cc,Iurn.t41
<br />Isanti County
<br />Isanti 741]
<br />(29.9%113%157.1 %)
<br />1
<br />Sherburne County j r�J•
<br />3,606 ' •
<br />(94.5%12.8%12.8%)�j�
<br />Sherburne
<br />Frri
<br />City of Elk River City of Nowthen
<br />4,691 603;
<br />(94.3%13.4%12.3%) I (54.8%132.7%112.6%)
<br />--t41 I
<br />f OMDIAM(6-10arrOia;SB l
<br />liar-
<br />Top Cities Using SB TH101 Crossing:
<br />1. Elk River (41.8%)
<br />2. Ramsey (5.6%)
<br />3. Nowthen (3.2%)
<br />plus
<br />4. Sherburne Co. other area (31.9%)
<br />5. Northern External (5.4%)
<br />4
<br />r
<br />//i-i:L=.
<br />Wright
<br />Anoka
<br />1
<br />City of Ramsey
<br />> k 2,828 ▪ - City of Andover
<br />x._ (20 7%160 4%118 9%) C- ' 3,272
<br />` 1 (3.8%129.2%167%)
<br />416 ..ti.�
<br />j City of Anoka
<br />I �' 2,468
<br />r--
<br />(3.9%1 2.6%123.5%)
<br />OMD AM(uL Dam) via SB US1 69:
<br />Top Cities Using SB US169 Crossing:
<br />1. Anoka(26.8%)
<br />2. Ramsey (26.0%)
<br />3. Andover(14.6%)
<br />4. Coon Rapids (10.9%)
<br />5. Nowthen (3.0%)
<br />ID
<br />j Trj
<br />Hennepin
<br />1
<br />I
<br />f
<br />Dakota
<br />.unt
<br />4
<br />:,<}._ I
<br />1
<br />I
<br />Washington County
<br />689 51.
<br />(1.1 %12%197%)'\ j °
<br />r
<br />ri
<br />I L
<br />N Author: HXiao Total Origin Trips Using Current Three Crossings in Southbound(6-10am)
<br />Date: 10/5/2020
<br />Northwest Metro Mississippi River Crossing Feasibility Analysis
<br />MnDOT Metro, Minnesota
<br />Figure 5.1
<br />
|