Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Heineman stated he would agree with the City’s purchase of the outlot with the <br />understanding that it would be transferred. <br /> <br />The developer stated the preference of Lennar would be to give the outlot to the City. He added <br />he would be okay with the City contacting the existing homeowners about inheriting the outlot. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked whether there would be any cost to replat the outlot into smaller lots. <br />He added he would not want to incur City costs to give the outlots away. <br /> <br />The developer stated the cost would be related to the lot split process and deed to each of 5 <br />properties, but that would be a City-driven process. He added he agrees the outlot would need to <br />be in City possession first. He noted he would need to check timelines at the County to make sure <br />that this process does not inhibit Lennar’s ability to install utilities and do street work this fall, as <br />most of the site grading is done. <br /> <br />Comment Musgrove requested that the motion should specify “Outlot B”. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Riley, seconded by Councilmember Woestehoff, to adopt Resolution <br />#21-265 Approving Final Plat and Development Agreement for Northfork Meadows, Case of <br />Lennar, with the following additions: <br /> <br />-Final plat contingent upon adding outlots based on neighbor property boundaries <br /> -Add “Outlot B” <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Riley, Woestehoff, Heineman, <br />Howell, Musgrove, and Specht. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />7.04: Consider Petition for a Cartway to Access Thorn Lake Property (PID #04-32-25-31- <br />0001); case of Thomas and Pattiann Kurak <br /> <br />City Engineer Bruce Westby reviewed a petition from the property owners, the Kuraks, to add a <br />cartway for access to their 40-acre landlocked parcel, west of the Williams Woods parcel. A <br />cartway is allowed on a property with the statutory requirements of 5 acres or larger in size and <br />landlocked, with no public access, and the cartway must be 33 feet minimum in width. The <br />applicant can decide how they want to improve or service the cartway. This request is for access <br />in the northeast corner of the site. An additional resolution could be passed regarding maintenance <br />of the cartway. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated the City must issue an order describing the cartway route, and work <br />with impacted property owners to grant the cartway easement. The City Council may conduct a <br />public hearing, and the petitioner must personally deliver hearing notices to the affected property <br />owners. The petitioner is responsible for all costs and damages related to the proposed cartway. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated the City can review the petitioners preferred route and may request a <br />different route with less impacts. The City may request a bond from the petitioner for an estimate <br />City Council / September 14, 2021 <br />Page 15 of 19 <br /> <br />