Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl reviewed a request for preliminary plat for North Brook Meadows, <br />previously called the Hunt project or Hunt addition, a 38-acre site that is proposed to have 77 <br />single-family lots. The lots would be 80 feet wide, as approved in 2011, and would meet all City <br />Code standards. An infrastructure study, funded by the developers and the City, has been <br />completed showing how utilities will get to the site. Residents in the area are concerned about <br />wetlands and flood plains on the site, and have requested sidewalks and trails, which are proposed, <br />as well as a pedestrian crossing. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated City Staff is open to a request that some of the proposed <br />th <br />plantings be moved to the site border along 175 Avenue to buffer the neighborhood. She <br />reviewed unique aspects of the project, including road upgrades, landscaping and trails. She noted <br />this item is to introduce the topic and no formal action is required. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked how the unique conditions will be funded. Senior Planner McGuire Brigl <br />stated all unique additions are at the cost of the developer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley requested clarification regarding the utility infrastructure study for both <br />developments. He added he would not want that to end up being a burden on the City. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated, if this project moves forward without the other project, it <br />will cost the developer $800,000 in utilities changes. She added there would be no cost to the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked whether the unique aspects of the project fall under the “but for” <br />clause. She added the developer should pay for the turn lanes because without the development, <br />they would not be necessary. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated these are not standards that you would normally see in a <br />residential subdivision. She added City Staff plans to move forward with the turn lane because <br />the City Council and residents have requested it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated the developer’s traffic study showed a need for the turn lanes, <br />so they are based on the development. She added several turn lanes were recommended in the <br />study. She asked whether the other turn lanes will be pursued. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated the turn lane under consideration would be north on Nowthen <br />rd <br />Boulevard turning west on 173 Avenue. She added that is all that is requested right now but <br />different options can be reviewed and discussed at a future meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated the traffic study shows the need for three turn lanes: northbound <br />into the development; southbound into the development; and southbound out of the development. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated City Staff will look into it and come back with a <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove expressed concern regarding easements, specifically on Block 3, Lot <br />1, which is in the natural gas easement. She added that homeowner will not be able to build <br />City Council / September 14, 2021 <br />Page 9 of 19 <br /> <br />