Laserfiche WebLink
Trott Brook North Property, Ramsey <br />Wetland Delineation Report <br />Table 2. Soil types mapped on the Trott Brook North site. <br />Symbol <br />y <br />Soil Name <br />Acres <br />% of <br />Area <br />% Hydric <br />Y <br />Hydric Category <br />Y g Y <br />NyA <br />y <br />Nymore loamy sand, 0 to 2 <br />percent slopes <br />26.9 <br />13.40% <br />0 <br />Not Hydric <br />y <br />NyB <br />y <br />Nymore loamy sand, 1 to 6 <br />percent slopes <br />34 <br />17.00% <br />0 <br />Not Hydric <br />y <br />NyC <br />y <br />Nymore loamy sand, 6 to 12 <br />percent slopes <br />34 <br />17.00% <br />0 <br />Not Hydric <br />y <br />Rf <br />Rifle mucky peat <br />32.9 <br />16.40% <br />100 <br />Hydric <br />ZmB <br />Zimmerman fine sand, 1 to 6 <br />percent slopes <br />13 <br />6.50% <br />2 <br />PredominantlyNon-Hydric <br />ZmC <br />Zimmerman fine sand, 6 to 12 <br />percent slopes <br />0.6 <br />0.30% <br />4 <br />PredominantlyNon-Hydric <br />ZmD <br />Zimmerman fine sand, 12 to 24 <br />percent slopes <br />0 <br />0.00% <br />2 <br />PredominantlyNon-Hydric <br />The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources <br />2015) showed DNR Public Wetland 2-319W (unnamed) within site boundaries, and Trott Brook <br />(DNR Public Ditch/Altered Natural Watercourse M-063-001.5) along the much of the south site <br />boundary (Figure 5). <br />The National Hydrography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed one Lake/Pond <br />surface water feature within site boundaries and one Stream/River along much of the south site <br />boundary (Figure 6). <br />4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations <br />Potential wetlands were evaluated during field observations on June 2, 2021. Eight (8) wetlands <br />were identified and delineated on the property (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are <br />included in Appendix B. The following description of the wetlands and their adjacent upland <br />reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that time, the crop field had been <br />planted to corn and vegetation was actively growing in natural areaa on the site. Precipitation <br />conditions were normal (typical) based on the three-month antecedent precipitation data and <br />drier than the normal range based on the 30-day rolling total (Appendix C). Delineated wetland <br />characteristics are summarized in Table 3 (see page 6). <br />4.3 Aerial Review for Offsite Hydrology Determinations <br />Methods <br />Areas in agricultural cropland that exhibited potential wetland signatures on aerial photography <br />and with low or depressional topography were reviewed generally following methods described <br />in Using Aerial Imagery to Assess Wetland Hydrology (Minnesota Board of Water and Soil <br />Resources (BWSR) 2010) and Guidance for Submittal of Delineation Reports to the St. Paul <br />District Corps of Engineers and Wetland Conservation Act Local Governmental Units in <br />Minnesota, Version 2.0 (USAGE 2015). <br />5 <br />