Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit 1 <br />Field data sheet reference (if applicable): <br />Wetland Hydrology from Aerial Imagery —Recording Form <br />Project Name: <br />Investigator: <br />Trott Brook North Date: 7-15-2021 <br />M. Barrett <br />County: Anoka <br />Legal Description (S, T, R): S:9 & 10 T:32N R:25W <br />Summary Table <br />Date Image <br />Taken (M-D-Y) <br />Image <br />Source <br />Climate <br />Condition <br />(wet, dry, <br />normal)1 <br />Image Interpretations) <br />Area: A <br />Area: B <br />Area: C <br />Area: D <br />Area: E <br />9-15-2015 <br />FSA <br />Normal <br />NV <br />NV <br />NV <br />DO (small) (1) <br />DO (1) <br />8-31-2017 <br />FSA <br />Normal <br />DO (small) (1) <br />NV <br />NV <br />DO (small) (2) <br />DO (2) <br />4-28-2018 <br />Google <br />Normal <br />NV <br />NV <br />NV <br />DO (3) <br />DO (3) <br />7-1-2019 <br />FSA <br />Normal <br />DO (small) (2) <br />NV <br />NV <br />DO (4) <br />DO (4) <br />10-9-2020 <br />Google <br />Normal <br />NV <br />NV <br />NV <br />DO (small) (5) <br />DO (small) (5) <br />Number of normal years <br />5 <br />5 <br />5 <br />5 <br />5 <br />Number with wet signatures <br />2 <br />0 <br />0 <br />5 <br />5 <br />Percent with wet signatures <br />40 % <br />0% <br />0% <br />100% <br />100% <br />Area: F <br />9-15-2015 <br />FSA <br />Normal <br />DO (1) <br />8-31-2017 <br />FSA <br />Normal <br />DO (2) <br />4-28-2018 <br />Google <br />Normal <br />DO (3) <br />7-1-2019 <br />FSA <br />Normal <br />DO (4) <br />10-9-2020 <br />Google <br />Normal <br />DO (5) <br />Number of normal years <br />5 <br />Number with wet signatures <br />5 <br />Percent with wet signatures <br />100% <br />KEY <br />WS - wetland signature <br />NC - not cropped <br />DO - drowned out <br />Other labels or comments: <br />SS - soil wetness signature <br />AP - altered pattern <br />SW - standing water <br />Washout — Apparent Erosion <br />CS - crop stress <br />NV - normal vegetative cover <br />NSS — no soil wetness signature <br />• Use above keyto label image interpretations. It is imperative that the reviewer read and understand the guidance associated with the use of these labels. If alternate labels are used, indicate in box above. <br />• If less than five (5) images taken during normal climate conditions are available, use an equal number of images taken during wet and dry climate conditions and use as many images as you have available. Describe <br />the results using this methodology in your report. <br />1 Use MN State Climatologywebsite to determine climate condition <br />