My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 09/14/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 09/14/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:09:28 AM
Creation date
10/22/2021 12:19:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
09/14/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Riley stated he did not look at the test results, but he remembers that Ms. Klimmek <br />scored low on a question regarding her own weaknesses. He added she answered a question <br />poorly. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman agreed, adding it was two questions in a row and both of them were <br />answered poorly. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked whether that issue has been addressed by the testing. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Colleen Lasher stated this issue was addressed in the testing <br />process and it was determined that the candidate fully accepts and acknowledges when they have <br />made a mistake. She added they do not feel that they are perfect, and they were able to produce a <br />good example of a time when they made a mistake or an error in judgment in the past and how <br />they rectified it. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated the consultant reviewed this issue at length and did not believe it <br />to be a problem. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell asked about City Staff’s opinions about the two differing backgrounds of <br />the candidates. She added they have both worn a lot of hats and come from smaller cities; Mr. <br />Hagen is a city administrator, and Ms. Klimmek has a different role, but they are both great <br />candidates. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated he feels it is a detriment that Mr. Hagen has only worked for one <br />small city. He added, considering overall experience, he does not think as highly of him as he did. <br />He noted Ms. Klimmek has more diverse experience <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated Ms. Klimmek’s experience with the business community is <br />invaluable and more in line with the day-to-day duties. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated Mr. Hagen’s experience dealing with contractors would come <br />in handy, but Ms. Klimmek has more experience with a bigger team in Big Lake. He added, <br />overall, he puts a lot of weight on City Staff’s opinion, and staff have made their points fairly clear <br />across the board that Ms. Klimmek’s experience is preferable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman asked whether City Staff is still leaning toward Ms. Klimmek. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich confirmed this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman stated he found both to be great candidates. He added he was hoping <br />the evaluation process would produce something to make the selection process easier. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma stated he is in favor of Ms. Klimmek, as her development experience will help grow <br />the community. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / September 14, 2021 <br />Page 2 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.