My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 08/26/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 08/26/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:47:46 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 9:21:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/26/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Walker asked if this is City owned property that would be leased to a sign company. <br />He asked if this ordinance would be intended to allow the City to do something that no other <br />property could do. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that three signs would be allowed with spacing two <br />miles between signs, therefore other properties would be allowed if they met that distance. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that his issue is that the Commission would be recommending an <br />ordinance that only the City would benefit from financially. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked the size of the sign that the City currently has on Highway 10. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl estimated the digital display section to be about 150 square feet. <br />Commissioner Anderson noted that the digital display section of the City sign is clearly too small <br />while he believes the Champlin billboard is much too big. He stated that perhaps half of that size <br />be allowed. He stated that it would be nice to generate revenue from the sign, but he was unsure <br />that he wanted it to be owned by the City. He stated that perhaps the land is rented, which would <br />generate income. He stated that sign height will also be an issue because the new interchanges <br />may impact views. <br />Commissioner Gengler stated that she believes that the current proposal would have a sign <br />company leasing the space from the City and the City would only have the one sign, which would <br />leave two additional spots open for others that are interested. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that the City does have a vendor it has been working <br />with and the City is working on lease negotiations with that vendor. She stated that the EDA and <br />City Council have chosen the vendor and made the decision to allow this, therefore an ordinance <br />is needed. <br />Chairperson Bauer noted that two other private parties could come forward with proposals if they <br />met the requirements of the ordinance and spacing. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the draft ordinance includes a stipulation that there would <br />need to be some benefit to Ramsey, such as a welcome to Ramsey statement, or advertising space <br />for the City. <br />Commissioner Gengler stated that she is concerned with the two privately owned lots. She stated <br />that parts of the overlay are close to residential areas and asked if there could be stipulations on <br />where the sign could shine to avoid impact to the adjacent residential areas. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that the residential zoned and mixed -use zoned <br />properties were not allowed and noted that an additional stipulation could be added requiring a <br />certain distance from residential property. <br />Commissioner Peters referenced the sign for Suite Living, noting that the sign is very bright. <br />Planning Commission/ August 26, 2021 <br />Page 21 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.