My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:48:04 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 9:26:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/23/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sense. She commented that it is expensive to build these units and therefore she did not believe <br />there would be a rush of applications. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he also liked the Dayton ordinance which separated detached <br />and attached units and would like to see that in the Ramsey ordinance. <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that he was a bit concerned with the clause that the Dayton ordinance <br />included related to an expiration as the building would still remain. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that he thinks the idea would be that if he built the unit and obtained <br />the proper license, that would expire when the property is sold, but the new property owner would <br />be able to apply with the City to obtain their own license. <br />Chairperson Bauer noted that Dayton uses an Interim Use Permit, which he does not favor using. <br />He believed that an ordinance should address subsequent ownership. <br />Commissioner VanScoy noted that the Dayton ordinance only allows familial occupation. He <br />stated that Ramsey would allow rental and therefore that would be irrelevant. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that a lot of cities in Iowa were previously challenged on the <br />definition of family and did not believe that is something Ramsey wants to get in the business of; <br />regulating who is or is not family. She stated that if the units are desired, she would suggest they <br />be allowed and not dictate who lives in the unit. <br />Commissioner Walker commented that he would like to see a draft following the Dayton model, <br />without the IUP. He stated that for attached units he would like to limit the lot size that it could <br />be on. <br />Commissioner Gengler stated that she believed that internal units are already allowed without <br />permitting. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that as long as the unit can access the front door from <br />the interior, it is currently allowed. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl summarized the input from the Commission and noted that staff <br />will prepare a draft ordinance for the Commission to review at its October meeting. <br />Commissioner Gengler asked if the Commission would support these units on lots under 2.5 acres. <br />Commissioner Walker commented that he believed the direction was to allow attached on lots <br />under 2.5 acres and detached would be allowed on lots over 2.5 acres. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that she did not believe there would be many requests <br />on smaller lots because of the required setbacks and maximum lot coverage requirements. <br />8. COMMISSION / STAFF INPUT <br />Planning Commission/ September 23, 2021 <br />Page 13 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.