My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:48:04 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 9:26:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/23/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tabone commented that the outlot would be deeded to the HOA and would be incorporated <br />as a common landscape or maintenance area. He noted that there are comments in the purchase <br />agreement that states property owners should stay out of that area. He noted that the HOA <br />documents and disclosures are recorded against property title. <br />Kyle Swenson, 15049 Iguana Street, stated that his property is directly west of this property. He <br />commented that he likes the idea of the outlot. He stated that no matter what happens to the field <br />that exists, it will take away from the enjoyment of his property but recognized that change is <br />coming. He stated that there will be several homes in this development and if two homes are <br />removed, this would meet all the City requirements. He recognized that Lennar is attempting to <br />maximize profits, but the City rules should also be followed. He appreciated the 45-foot transition <br />area with the berm and the redesigns that have been done but also believed that the rules should <br />be followed. He stated that it is important for architects and developers to follow the rules that are <br />set by City Code. He stated that he also wants to be reasonable and understands there is some give <br />and take. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he had a similar question. He stated that the developer <br />followed the Code in the original proposal and in the past the transition area would have been done <br />through easement and the underlying land would have been included in the lot size. He stated that <br />because there have been issues in the past with people removing trees or altering the buffer area, <br />the City now requires that transition area to be within an outlot which removes that lot area from <br />the individual lot. <br />Mr. Swenson acknowledge that fact but noted that he will have six or seven homes along his <br />property line, and the middle two lots are tiny. He stated that there will be a large home on the lot <br />and tiny backyard that takes up almost the entire backyard. He stated that if one of those lots were <br />removed and one additional lot to the north were removed, it would make the lots larger. <br />Chairperson Bauer referenced the four lots on the west side and asked what size backyard would <br />be anticipated for those homes. <br />Mr. Tabone commented that the depths of the homes vary, noting that the pads are set to be 60 feet <br />deep therefore the homes are typically 50 to 55 feet deep. He noted that there are some additional <br />options such as a morning room or porch that would be another ten to 15 feet, but not all on the <br />back. He stated that their building footprints do show an outdoor living space. He stated that there <br />have been situations in multiple municipalities where the full lot size is credited to the property <br />line with an easement placed over the density transitioning area. He stated that placing the density <br />transitioning area into an outlot creates a tricky situation. He noted that they have already dropped <br />lots from the original development proposal. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked if some of the homes would have a second story that protrudes further <br />than the first floor. <br />Mr. Tabone commented that it would depend on the selections of the property owner. He stated <br />that most property owners would choose a deck option. He stated that there is an option for a four - <br />Planning Commission/ September 23, 2021 <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.