My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:16:30 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 2:25:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/09/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
461
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 7, 1, <br />Meeting Date: 11/09/2021 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Density Transitioning Options for North Brook Meadows (Project No. 21-131); Case of Platinum Land <br />LLC <br />Purpose/Background: <br />On September 28, 2021, the City Council approved, with contingencies, the Preliminary Plat for North Brook <br />Meadows. The project is located at the southwest corner of Nowthen Boulevard and 175th Avenue NW (the <br />"Subject Property") and includes seventy-seven (77) single family residential lots that will be served by municipal <br />sanitary sewer and water. One of the focal points of discussion during the Preliminary Plat review was on the <br />density transitioning and, more specifically, whether it should be accomplished via an outlot (separate from the <br />individual residential lots) owned by a Home Owners Association (HOA) or if it should be part of each of the <br />residential lots and encumbered by an easement granted to and enforced by the City. Staff was directed to circle <br />back with this topic for further direction by City Council at a future meeting. <br />Notification: <br />Notification is not required. <br />Time Frame/Observations/Alternatives: <br />There are pros and cons for either option that are outlined below: <br />Platted as Separate Outlot <br />Pros: <br />• Distinctly separate from new residential lots, which generally means less likelihood for tree removal and/or <br />improvements (sheds, pools, etc.) in the transition area. <br />• Creates a better sense of buffering for existing neighborhood, again due to being separate from the new <br />residential lots. <br />Cons: <br />• As a separate parcel, there is no incentive for owners of the new lots to maintain the transition area and after <br />the initial two (2) years (which are covered with a Maintenance Surety via a Development Agreement), no <br />way to ensure replacement of dead trees if the HOA is defunct. <br />• With no other purpose for an HOA other than to own/maintain this outlot, there is a high probability of it <br />going tax forfeit. If that happens, either the City would end up with it (along with the responsibilities of <br />maintenance) or some private party may acquire it, which could present other issues. <br />Platted as Part of Lots and Encumbered by Easement <br />Pros: <br />• As part of each new lot, greater incentive for the new property owners to maintain the transition area (trees <br />and ground cover). <br />• More likely to be irrigated, which is certainly beneficial at least in terms of initial establishment of the tree <br />plantings. <br />Cons: <br />• Enforcement of restrictions more challenging for the City. Possible issues that could arise include: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.