My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 11/09/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:16:30 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 2:25:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/09/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
461
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Heineman stated he supports the project, but the City needs to do a better job of <br />protecting the rural characteristics of Ramsey. He added he does not support expanding that far <br />north, although this is private property. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated she has difficulty supporting this because of the issue of <br />enforcing the easement. <br />Mayor Kuzma stated he has concerns about traffic. <br />Motion failed. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Woestehoff, Heineman, and Riley. Voting No: <br />Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Howell, Musgrove and Specht. <br />Motion by Councilmember Woestehoff to Adopt Resolution #21-248 as Drafted, Including <br />Contingencies to Require that 175th Avenue is Restriped as per the Traffic Study; Modify Planting <br />Plan to Creatively Distribute Plantings to Buffer 175th Avenue; Contingent upon Traffic Review <br />with Anoka County; and Contingent upon Buffer Area Under Easement or Outlot of Shared <br />Ownership. <br />Further discussion: <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated this is the first opportunity that the City Council has had to <br />discuss the easement vs. outlot issue. She added she would like to have more information on the <br />buffer zone to be able to support this project. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated he is concerned about legal ramifications for the City if this <br />request is not approved, as it meets every requirement that the City has posted. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated a second to the motion is needed. He reviewed proposed <br />conditions added to the motion: <br />- Contingent upon buffer area under shared ownership as outlot or easement <br />- Discussion at future City Council meeting to ensure education <br />Councilmember Heineman seconded the motion with the additional conditions. <br />Councilmember Heineman stated he understands the frustration of the residents of this <br />neighborhood. He added the rules are established, and it is the job of the governing body to ensure <br />the rights of the individuals over a majority. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Woestehoff, Heineman, Musgrove, <br />and Riley. Voting No: Councilmembers Howell and Specht. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.