Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session 7, 5, <br />Meeting Date: 01 / 12/2021 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #21-021 Approving REVISED Sanitary Sewer Maintenance and Rain Garden Agreement for <br />River Walk Village; Case of N & D Management, LLC <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to review a request by N & D Management Management, LLC to request an additional <br />revision to the Council Approved Sanitary Sewer and Rain Garden Maintenance Agreement for River Walk <br />Village. The Developer has accepted the maintenance obligations as approved by City Council. However, the <br />Developer requested removal of the inspection requirement and frequency. After meeting with Public Works and <br />Engineering Staff, City Staff is comfortable with this provision change. <br />A material change is requested by the is how the Agreement is signed and where the agreement is recorded. Instead <br />of being recorded against individual properties after signed by the current owner (and passed down with each <br />subsequent Buyer), the Agreement is proposed to be executed by the HOA (currently the same as Builder - Price <br />Custom Homes) and recorded against HOA Property (not individual lots). In exchange, the HOA documents that <br />are recorded against each individual property will be revised to reflect the existence of the Agreement. While not <br />ideal, it is acceptable and has been reviewed by the City Attorney. <br />Please note that Staff was put in a difficult situation with a recent transaction. The Council approved an Agreement <br />that the Developer continued to dispute after approval. Staff was aware that a closing was to occur in the near future <br />and had repeatedly asked if this agreement had been disclosed and reminded the Developer that the agreement <br />needed to be recorded against individual properties. The Developer did not disclose the agreement and asked Staff <br />to quickly revise the day of closing. The Buyer ultimately contacted City Staff and Staff was able to close the loop <br />and allow the closing to occur. Unfortunately, this materially changed the structure of the agreement. Staff believes <br />the City's liability is still covered as outlined above. <br />This was a unique project and this process would not be followed in the future. Design Standards are being updated <br />to eliminate this type of design as an option in the future. Moving forward, even if time is of the essence, projects <br />will not be allowed to move forward until maintenance agreements such as this are executed and recorded. <br />The original case text begins below. <br />When the River Walk Village project was approved, the sanitary sewer plans included a small, private, forcemain. <br />due to the . The forcemain was necessary because the topography of the site did not allow wastewater to gravity <br />flow to connect with the existing sanitary sewer. This forcemain is much smaller (2-inch diameter) than the City's <br />existing forcemains, so approval was contingent upon maintenance by the individual homeowners/HOA. The City <br />does not have the appropriate equipment to remove any blockages from the small diameter pipe. The intent of this <br />compromise was for the homeowners to be responsible for regular maintenance of the line. <br />Additionally, the Developer proposed a rain garden to meet the requirements of the Lower Rum River Watershed <br />Management Organization. A requirement of that was also to enter into a maintenance agreement. Both obligations <br />have been included in a single agreement. <br />Notification: <br />