Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Riley, Musgrove, Howell, Specht, <br />and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. <br />The public hearing was closed at 7:26 p.m. <br />Council Business <br />Motion by Councilmember Woestehoff, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to introduce <br />Ordinance #21-05 Vacating 60 Foot Easement Related to Riverstone 4th Addition and adopt <br />Resolution #21-017 Approving Development Agreement for Riverstone 5th Addition. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Woestehoff, Specht, Howell, <br />Musgrove, and Riley. Voting No: None. <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />7.01: Adopt Resolution #21-001 Approving the 2021 Council Organization <br />City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the staff report and recommendation to adopt the resolution <br />approving the 2021 Council organization. <br />Motion by Councilmember Riley, seconded by Councilmember Howell, to Adopt Resolution #21- <br />001 for 2021 Council Organization. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Riley, Howell, Musgrove, Specht, <br />and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. <br />Utilities Case was removed from the agenda <br />7.03: Adopt Resolution #21-018 Providing Feedback for Bacon Property Sketch Plan; Case <br />of Bill Boyum <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation to adopt the <br />resolution and provide the applicant feedback on which concept plan to move forward with and <br />develop a formal sketch plan application. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked for the potential to have a wider road to help with concerns that <br />could arise from the length of the cul-de-sac. She asked if there is an easement on the northern <br />portion of the property that could provide a connection to a future road. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill replied that this concept does not include an easement for a <br />future road, as it would be unlikely that a connection would be made because of the wetlands. He <br />stated that staff has made the comment that the road be widened to 32 feet wide, recognizing that <br />there are some wetland constraints. <br />City Council / January 12, 2021 <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />