My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/18/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/18/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 11:42:10 AM
Creation date
11/18/2021 10:49:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
11/18/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Further discussion: Commissioner Walker asked why the fees have not been raised in the past <br />three years, noting that everything costs more money now than it did three years ago. He <br />referenced the anticipated future needs, using the example of the dog park discussions. He <br />commented that real estate value continues to increase, and the fees should increase in a relative <br />manner. Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that the City Council <br />also provides input and the desire to welcome certain developments. He stated that the <br />Commission can make a different recommendation for the Park Dedication rates related to <br />residential development. Commissioner Sis stated that while the cost of playground equipment <br />and other materials has increased, he believed that there was a decrease in the cost of paving this <br />past year. Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood provided additional clarity <br />on the difference in costs and actual costs for paving and trails. He also provided explanation on <br />the use of charitable gambling funds. Chair Bennett stated that there were previous concerns <br />expressed that if the City was not competitive in terms of fees, Ramsey would not be competitive <br />in terms of development opportunity. Commissioner Walker asked for information on the rates of <br />other communities. Chair Bennett replied that Ramsey was slightly below some cities previously <br />but ended up rating fairly competitively. Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent <br />Riverblood stated that action could be tabled on this matter with clear direction for what the <br />Commission would like to review at the November meeting, which would still be on schedule for <br />the Council review prior to the end of the year. He stated that typically Ramsey has ranked slightly <br />below the median for development fees as the Council has desired to remain competitive. He <br />stated that the rates will vary and provided the example of Anoka, which is almost built out and <br />therefore may have higher rates, and Nowthen which has low rates because there is comparatively <br />less development. Cornrnissioner Sis asked if staff would have sufficient time to bring this matter <br />back in November and then forward to the Council to remain on schedule. Parks & Assistant <br />Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that there should not be an issue. <br />Commissioner Sis withdrew his motion to allow for further exploration and discussion. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood asked for input on what information <br />the Commission would like to review at the November meeting. <br />Cornrnissioner Sis stated that he would like to see the rates of comparable communities. <br />Commissioner Barten stated that he would be interested in Elk River, Otsego, and Rogers. <br />Commissioner Walker mentioned Coon Rapids. Blaine was also mentioned. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that staff would review the <br />neighboring communities and would also review five cities of comparable population in different <br />areas of the metro. <br />Cornrnissioner Leistico asked if there would be a manner to determine if the actual costs are being <br />covered in the rates. She agreed with the statement of Commissioner Walker that everything has <br />increased in cost in the past three years and wanted to ensure that the City's costs are covered in <br />attempt to meet the future desires of the park system. <br />Park and Recreation Commission/October 14, 2021 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.