Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Howell asked if the developer is responsible for any improvements other than to <br />rd <br />173 Avenue. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl replied, yes. As a part of the resolution, the developer would be <br />responsible for improvements on Nowthen Boulevard and Variolite Street as recommended in the <br />traffic study. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell referenced page two and number three (iii) in the case where it says <br />rd <br />“improvements on 173 Avenue as recommended in the traffic study” and suggested adding an <br />addendum “as conducted by the City of Ramsey.” And wherever is says “in the traffic study” add <br />“in the City of Ramsey” and make that change in the preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Specht, seconded by Councilmember Howell, to adopt Resolution #21- <br />319 to complete a traffic study with a not-to-exceed amount of $15,000 and to table consideration <br />of Resolution #21-309 until the January 11, 2022 meeting. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley commented that the traffic study would indicate how the roads need to be <br />reconfigured but questioned if the layout of the plat would need to change based on the traffic <br />study. Councilmember Riley asked if different aspects need to be changed, how would they <br />incorporate paying for them, noting that maybe they will find adjustments have to be made to have <br />traffic go in a different way, which would impact the road. He wanted to ensure they have accurate <br />information before making a full decision. Mayor Kuzma expressed concern that two traffic <br />studies have already been done, they have been reviewed by WSB and also Bolton and Menk. He <br />felt it would be a waste of money to redo the study because it would likely have the same results <br />that are reviewed by the same people. Mayor Kunza indicated he would not be giving his support. <br />Councilmember Heineman commented that the Council has an obligation to public safety and if <br />there are alterations that need to be made, it makes sense that they do it this way. He will be giving <br />his support. Councilmember Riley commented that there are two items in the motion so he won’t <br />be giving his support. City Administrator Ulrich recommended having two separate motions for <br />the sake of clarity. <br /> <br />Substitute motion by Councilmember Specht, seconded by Councilmember Heineman, to adopt <br />Resolution #21-319 to complete a traffic study with a not-to-exceed amount of $15,000. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Specht, Heineman, Musgrove, Woestehoff, <br />Howell, and Riley. Voting No: Mayor Kuzma. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Specht, seconded by Councilmember Howell, to table Resolution #21- <br />309 until the January 11, 2022 meeting. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented he understood the intent of the motion but asked that the <br />motion be withdrawn so they can vote on Resolution #21-23 first. City Administrator Ulrich <br />City Council / November 9, 2021 <br />Page 15 of 26 <br /> <br />