Laserfiche WebLink
<br />six to ten. She noted the Interim Use Permit would be for five storage containers on the property. <br />She explained that the property currently has several uses including retail, residential, commercial <br />operations, and storage containers. A site plan is procedural for an expansion of a commercial <br />property, which would be a contingency on the CUP which would be an administrative site plan <br />review. <br /> <br />Zoning Code Enforcement Officer Raines presented two alternatives. Alternative 1 was to approve <br />the CUP and Interim Use Permit with conditions. Alternative 2 was to deny the CUP and IUP. <br />This would decrease the current expanded operation to its original footprint and allow five auto <br />sale tenants and one auto sales and repair tenant. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht commented that Highway 10 is nearby and asked if the site would be <br />impacted by the Highway 10 plans. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich replied no, the site wouldn’t be impacted. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Musgrove, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to adopt Resolution <br />#21-219 granting a Conditional Use Permit and declaring terms of agreement at 7127 Highway 10 <br />NW; Case of Ron Touchette. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: <br /> <br />Ron Touchette, 7127 Highway 10 NW, stated he has owned and operated the property for over 30 <br />years. He started the body shop and has continued to operate it. He referenced discussion on <br />property rights and owners’ property rights and stated he feels his property rights have been stolen. <br />He explained that ten years ago, the City told his tenants and businesses to leave because of the <br />incoming highway so his income was affected. Today, he is asking to be able to operate the body <br />shop and a motion today would limit him to double parking of the damaged cars so he can’t operate <br />the body shop. Mr. Touchette stated that the damaged cars don’t move but may stay parked for a <br />time awaiting parts and for many years there wasn’t an issue with the additional parking. He <br />requested that the resolution be passed as presented. Councilmember Musgrove asked Mr. <br />Touchette if he agreed with the plans or if there was anything he would like to see changed. Mr. <br />Touchette replied the plan that was created was a good one that would work. Councilmember <br />Musgrove asked about the lawful nonconforming status on this area with regard to the parking on <br />non-pervious surfaces. Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated the applicant is proposing two rows <br />of parking in the back, which the safety team is comfortable with but they don’t like to see cars <br />triple or quadruple stacked. Councilmember Howell asked the applicant if he agreed with the <br />motion as presented and if it would make his business viable. Mr. Touchette confirmed this. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Musgrove, Specht, Heineman, <br />Howell, Riley, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. <br />7.03: Adopt Resolution #21-314 to Approve a Private Kennel License for the Property <br />rd <br />Located at 6620 153 Ct NW (Project 21-143); Case of Roger Vargas <br /> <br />City Council / November 9, 2021 <br />Page 18 of 26 <br /> <br />