My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/26/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/26/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:11:19 AM
Creation date
11/29/2021 4:27:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/26/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove referenced IT Manager Frederickson’s comment about the Police <br />Department and asked if IT right now supports the technical computer networking needs of the <br />Police Department as well. <br /> <br />IT Manager Fredrickson confirmed this and added they are also responsible for the Fire <br />Department, Public Works, and City Hall. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff referenced the new position and the instance where LOGIS has taken <br />several months to address needs. He asked if this new position is intended to not only offset the <br />cost but also the speed of LOGIS so the City wouldn’t remain vulnerable for such a long time. <br /> <br />IT Manager Frederickson confirmed this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated he supported this role but had concerns that the description as <br />written would require finding someone who is a good systems person and a good network person, <br />which would be difficult because they are different things. He felt the position would be the right <br />step for security but from a systems administration standpoint, a network administrator would be <br />a different role for years from now. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked if the Council had questions or objections to the new positions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell referenced the new positions and the expenditures, noting it is a big <br />expenditure. She felt in regard to the Parks Maintenance Worker, that there are ways they could <br />be creative with putting in natural grasses and wildflowers to cut down on park maintenance time. <br />In regard to the Security position, she asked if they had looked at other cities that use providers <br />other than LOGIS. <br /> <br />IT Manager Fredrickson answered he looked at third parties as far as what it would take to fulfill <br />the security side of this role, such as CIT which comes with mixed reviews from other cities. The <br />CIT intro package included a list of recommendations for security measures that needed to be met <br />and giving it back to the staff to do, with a cost of around $15,500 to just do that. He noted that <br />bringing on one of their people for a couple hours a week to do active security work and <br />remediation would be closer to the cost of this position, between $60,000- $80,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented from a market perspective, he would concur that LOGIS <br />is probably the cheapest option out there, noting they bill at $125 per hour, which is about $50 less <br />than what they bill for some of their clients. He stated the City is not getting a bad deal with LOGIS <br />but at the size and scale that the City operates, it’s advisable to have a dedicated systems person. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked, for comparison, what size of IT staff do other cities have. <br /> <br />IT Manager Fredrickson answered that he has spoken with several neighboring cities about the <br />size of their IT staff and learned that Elk River is at four, Coon Rapids also had four, and Andover <br />had two to three staff members. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / October 26, 2021 <br />Page 11 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.