My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/26/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/26/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:11:19 AM
Creation date
11/29/2021 4:27:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/26/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Specht asked for clarification about the table. <br /> <br />Finance Director Lund answered the 2022 Proposed Column lists all changes in fees regarding <br />building, water rates, those sorts of things. <br /> <br />Building Official Szykulski commented that the goal is to be close to neighboring cities. They <br />don’t want to be high, but where they are at with a lot of the fixed fees is pretty low compared to <br />some of the neighboring cities, noting it is a balance. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich asked for clarification regarding the issue that a couple of cities did not <br />appear to have planned check fees, if the information wasn’t available or because it is included in <br />another place. <br /> <br />Building Official Szykulski answered a lot of them are buried and hard to find so staff spent a lot <br />of time on city webpages trying to find this information. For example, on the Anoka website it <br />says “Plan Check, per state building code.” <br /> <br />Finance Director Lund added that 65% is the standard. <br /> <br />Building Official Szykulski agreed and added the big builder, Capstone, does the Repetitive Plan <br />Fee so a lot of the builders have similar plans which are reviewed through the Master Plan and all <br />additional plan submittals are at 25%. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked for clarification, that this is an increase in the City’s fees but it is still <br />in line with neighboring cities. <br /> <br />Building Official Szykulski confirmed this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked about some fees in neighboring cities that differ so it may be <br />difficult to find an average. For example, the septic fees. She asked, for clarification, about <br />increases specific to Ramsey and what the increase encompasses. She also asked for an <br />explanation whether residents pay the fees when they are already paying a salary and how the fee <br />covers the cost better. <br /> <br />Building Official Szykulski answered that septic systems are quite involved and have several <br />inspections that require significant staff time. This time of year, there is a high demand for it as <br />well. He noted the building code says “service fees are commensurate to the service provided.” <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked for further clarification on the larger process, stating the septic <br />was just an example. She wanted an idea of where the money was going that they are asking the <br />residents to pay with the fees. Councilmember Musgrove referenced the escrow fees and asked <br />about erosion control, noting the builders already require a fee for that and asked why the City <br />would have an erosion control fee listed as well. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / October 26, 2021 <br />Page 2 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.