Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Wiltgen answered they didn’t do that kind of analysis but as she mentioned, this study was to <br />illuminate the needs, address what river crossing capacity means, and brainstorm ideas and <br />determine if they are technically feasible for further consideration. She stated when holding one- <br />on-one conversations, they wanted to learn where the different stakeholders were coming from, <br />their different needs and perspectives. Ms. Wiltgen noted that with a large project like a river <br />crossing, there needs to be a lot of consensus building and this may be a point where local <br />stakeholders come together and start the long process of consensus building. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich asked if analysis was done on collector roads farther north and what <br />happens to traffic on Armstrong Boulevard and roads north of Highway 10. <br /> <br />Mr. Morris referenced the illustration in the meeting packet that shows travel patterns and <br />projected trips to use a new bridge, noting that once they cross the river, many go east or west <br />along Highway 10, a much smaller portion would continue along Armstrong Boulevard, and by <br />the time you are a mile north of Highway 10, traffic dissipates. <br /> <br />Anoka County Commissioner Matt Look commented that his observations would suppose that <br />MnDOT is supportive of Concept 1 and 2 or a variation and that Ramsey and significant users of <br />the Highway 169 Champlin bridge are supporters of Concepts 3 or 4. He assumes that Anoka <br />County would be supportive of this project but it has to be understood that Highway 65 is the <br />County’s top priority right now, that it is well underway with the studies, grants, and funding. <br />Commissioner Look stated having this project drafting a concept behind Highway 65 might be <br />well positioned for the next project in line. He noted it will take some time to tell the story, express <br />the need, and gather support with the legislators that will help to fund the project at the State and <br />federal levels. <br /> <br />Commissioner Look stated he reached out to Senator Robbins and suggested getting together with <br />Representatives Lazzaro and Heinrich to discuss opposition. As it relates to the Highway 10 <br />Coalition, he found members have been very helpful in advancing the Highway 10 projects but <br />may not be as enthusiastic about advancing this river crossing project. He noted Coon Rapids and <br />Andover may not show interest, but Anoka and Ramsey would be interested because it impacts <br />people coming through their areas. He stated assuming that Ramsey is supportive of this project, <br />if funding is traditionally the way it has been with MnDOT, the locals will need to take control, <br />get together with those across the river, and determine a time frame. <br /> <br />Commission Look pointed out that about every 14 years, project costs double. He estimated that <br />time to design, find project costs, pay for it, and construction time will use 10 years at least so time <br />is of the essence. He stated it depends on when Ramsey wants to push as funding is the key. He <br />stated again that Anoka County would be supportive and willing to be a champion with the <br />understanding that Highway 65 is next in line. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked Commissioner Look about the County priorities with Highway 65 <br />being next in line and asked if a third lane on Highway 10 is also high on their list of priorities as <br />most could get behind that project. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / October 12, 2021 <br />Page 6 of 13 <br /> <br />