Laserfiche WebLink
in 40 acres to 4 in I acre because it ignores the density ordinance. He noted the developer said <br />hc was trying to spread density throughout the development so he could build larger homes. The <br />developer said he lives on a large lot and his partner is also interested in living on a large lot in <br />this clevelopment. Mr. Uecker stated it is interesting to him that the developers are taking away <br />fi'om Ramsey residents what they want for themselves. He stated if this is approved, the <br />Comprehensive Plan is null and void and the City will never be able to say "no" to anyone again. <br />Mr. lJecker encouraged the Council to get more input from residents before deciding on their <br />l'ulure. <br /> <br />Mr. l,es Webb, 15540 Traprock Street, noted the Planning Commission voted against the <br />amendment and for the site plan and the majority did not think opening Traprock was necessary. <br />lfe presented pictures of Traprock Street to the Council and asked them to visualize traffic from <br />165 homes using Traprock Street, <br /> <br />Mr. Chtmk Hedstrom, 7100 166th Avenue NW, stated his concern is withthe south exit of the <br />next case under consideration. He stated he wants to speak 'no~;' because to wait one-half hour <br />won't dr) much good. He stated he moved to Ramsey about 10 years ago to a beautiful 7.5 acre <br />lot on 166~ Avenue that has a combination of swamps (wetland), woods, and meadow. He stated <br />he loves the property and setting and City staff had said it was their intention to maintain large <br />lots in this area of Ramsey, Traprock, the Gun Club, and the area he lives in. He stated he came <br />to Ramsey for large property, privacy, and the secluded nature of their home. He stated he will <br />be able to maintain the secluded nature of his home because he can plant a lot of trees and won't <br />have to look at homes less than 100 feet from his house. Mr. Hedstrom restated that Ramsey <br />staff assurecl him many times that they would maintain 4 in 40 density in rural areas like he lives <br />in. Mt'. [lcdstrom stated developments are a huge change in the nature of Ramsey and the <br />consideration tonight is to take a rural community, semi-rural community, and virtually turn it <br />into city. That is what is being voted on and he hopes the Council will carefully consider what <br />Ramscy has been. He noted many here tonight have stated they live in Ramsey for the <br />opportunity to have acreage, to not be inundated with a home every 250 feet. He stated he would <br />like the Council to maintain the integrity of the Ramsey community and not approve the <br />amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Hedstrom suggested the Comprehensive Plan is the <br />wtty that Ramsey and every other city in the State determines a planned, logical, and financially <br />feasible pattern of growth. <br /> <br />Gail Graw, 7930 - 161st Avenue, stated she purchased in Ramsey because that's the type of area <br />she wanted to live in. She suggested the area cannot support the number of homes being <br />considered to be built and she is concerned that beginning the expansion will run away as it has <br />in [~ake Ehno and Woodbury. <br /> <br />l)ick Church, 6900 - 169"' Avenue NW, stated the concern is that we wait to approve an <br />amendment until after MPCA approval related to the St. Anthony Gun soil and ground water <br />contamination. <br /> <br />M.~;. l~ynn Cole, 6951 - 168th Avenue, stated she has lived for in Ramsey for 16 years and her <br />husband has lived in Ramsey for over 30 years. She stated they are not against expansion but <br /> <br />City Council / March 22, 2005 <br /> Page 15 of 38 <br /> <br /> <br />