My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/23/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 08/23/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:54:07 PM
Creation date
8/19/2005 1:50:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/23/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Pearson, Cook, and Jeffrey. <br />Voting No: Councilmember Strommen. Abstain: Councilmember Elvig. Absent: <br />Counciln]cmber Olson. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of Sweet Bay Ridge; Case of Oakwood Land <br />I) evelopment <br /> <br />It was noted that the staff report for Case #4 was presented with Case #3. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig suggested the wetland areas be looked at, noting a corridor cuts through <br />the wetlm~d area. He stated he would like'to work with the developer to create a conservation <br />casement by acquisition, donation, or whatever means. He noted the plan shows lots abutting a <br />wetland but to get habitat flow, a conversation easement in back of these lots would be needed. <br />That type of easement would not allow fences or sheds or structures and would maintain the <br />main corridors. He stated another suggestion would be whether a boxed culvert could be used <br />f'or the roadways rather than filling the wetland areas. <br /> <br />Mayor {'}amec asked Bob Hamborg if the trail easement is behind the properties to the east side. <br /> <br />A resident indicated the trail easement was taken off the covenants when they were rewritten. <br /> <br />Councihnember Pearson asked if the property contamination will not be addressed without this <br />pro.jeer moving forward. <br /> <br />Mayor (1amec stated that,is the case. He asked about the clay targets. <br /> <br />Mr. [)etcrson stated that issue is also being addressed. <br /> <br />Councihnembcr Jeffrey asked for direction on the concern for the street through Traprock. He <br />stated he would like to see that access closed and a cul-de-sac created to provide separation. He <br />asked staf[" whether that would be an issue. <br /> <br />Mayor Garnet noted the Fire Chief usually does not support that type of roadway configuration. <br /> <br />l'ublic Works Director Kapler commented that in a perfect world it is better to have the streets <br />connect. He noted there is a 600 foot cul-de-sac length restriction that was first established <br />because o[' getting water in but it is also a concern for emergency vehicle access. <br /> <br />Councilmcrnber Cook asked if closing Traprock would cause a problem with fire response. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Kapler stated they would respond, dump water, go to the hydrant to fill, <br />and then come back in. <br /> <br />City Council / March 22, 2005 <br /> Page 21 of 38 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.