My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 08/23/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2005
>
Minutes - Council - 08/23/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 1:53:05 PM
Creation date
9/8/2005 7:28:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/23/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and is generally acceptable. Adequate parking spaces are shown according to City Code. The <br />Ramsey Office Condominiums site will share utility lines with the Slumberland site to the east. <br />The submitted grading and drainage plans will require some revision to ensure they comply with <br />the ovcrall grading and drainage plan that was approved with the original Rivenwick Village <br />subdivision. He advised staff is recommending approval of the site plan, contingent upon <br />compliance with the City Staff Review Letter and the Developer signing a Development Permit <br />with the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig asked if this site will be similar to the project off of Highway 10 near Rum <br />River Lumber. <br /> <br />Marty Fisher, representative of Premier Commercial Properties, stated they do not have another <br />project in that location. He distributed a sample of materials that will be used on the buildings. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated the City is pleased to see a Premier Commercial site located in <br />Ramsey again. <br /> <br />Motion by Councihnember Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Jeffrey, to approve the <br />proposed site plan contingent upon compliance with the City Staff Review Letter dated August <br />19, 2005 and the Developer signing a Development Permit with the City. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Pearson, Jeffrey, Cook, Elvig, <br />Olson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Mayor Gamec informed Mr. Fisher there will be a wrecking ball party at the <br />old Standard gas station located in this area, Premier Commercial Properties will soon have a <br />cleaner area. <br /> <br />Case #10: <br /> <br />Request for Revised Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Approval of Sunflower <br />Ridge 2"a Addition; Case of Orrin Thompson Homes <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director/HRA Executive Director Frolik explained the plans <br />approved for Sunflower Ridge in 2002 consisted of 18.6 acres proposed to be developed in two <br />phases with a total of 126 row style townhomes. The first phase has been developed and <br />contains 46 townhome units. Staff understands that the requested revisions to the preliminary <br />plat and site plan area a result of replacing some of the row style units with back-to-back units in <br />the second phase of the development. The second phase of Sunflower Ridge is proposed to <br />contain 37 row houses and 44 back-to-back homes. The net result is a total of 127 units on the <br />entirety of Sunflower Ridge. The property is currently zoned R-2 Medium Density Residential, <br />which allows up to seven units per acre. The net density, exclusive of the .5 acres of wetland is <br />seven units per acre. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik advised in accordance with the previously approved preliminary plat and final plat <br />and City Code, the second phase of Sunflower Ridge will be served by two public streets: <br />Iodine, which currently exists, and 154th Avenue NW. All row houses will have access to public <br />streets. The main changes to the preliminary plat and site plan are on Block 3, between Private <br /> <br />City Council / August 23, 2005 <br /> Page 13 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.