Laserfiche WebLink
We were not provided any information regarding traffic volumes such as Average Annual Daily <br />Traffic (AADT) counts or vehicle distribution for the roadways. We assumed these roadways will <br />be utilized mainly by automobiles, light trucks and school buses with some heavier vehicles such <br />as garbage trucks and UPS or FedEx type delivery vehicles. For the purposes of this evaluation, <br />we assume the street will generally be classified or described as a "typical urban street" and <br />estimate the pavement will be designed for a maximum of 100,000 Equivalent Single Axle Loads <br />(EASL's) over a design life of 20 years. The ESAL's have not been adjusted for any future growth. <br />Changes in the nature, design, or location of all or parts of this project may occur. Likewise, if the <br />proposed traffic volumes exceed these values we should be informed. Additional analyses and <br />revised recommendations may be necessary. <br />4.2 Discussion <br />Roadways/pavements Based on a brief review of historical aerial photographs available on <br />Google Earth and the Anoka County GIS website it appears that the streets were originally built <br />around 1997 and appear to be approaching or have exceeded their assumed 20-year design life. <br />It appears some, or all, of the streets were subject to some periodic maintenance that included seal <br />coating/chip coating. Evidence of fairly recent seal coating/chip coating was visible on cores 3, <br />4, 5 and 7 obtained from Iodine Court, Junkite Street and 146th Circle. Evidence of recent seal <br />coating/chip coating was not readily apparent at the remaining locations. <br />We observed longitudinal and transvers cracks with some "alligator" or fatigue cracking of the <br />pavement surfaces. The cracking observed could be the result of a combination of factors <br />including; inadequate pavement thickness, pavement age and/or possibly frost action/frost <br />heave. <br />Longitudinal cracking are cracks parallel to the pavement centerline or laydown direction. These <br />can be caused by poor joint construction, reflective cracking from an underlying layer, fatigue <br />cracking or top -down cracking resulting from the age of the pavement or due to expansion and <br />contraction of the pavement surface or increased traffic loads on the pavements. <br />Transverse cracking are cracks perpendicular to the roadway centerline or laydown direction. <br />These are often caused by shrinkage of the pavement surface, reflective cracking from an <br />underlying layer or top -down cracking. <br />Alligator or fatigue cracking can be symptomatic of poor subgrade soils and/or inadequate <br />pavement thickness. <br />Aggregate Base An apparent aggregate base layer was observed below the pavements at each <br />boring location. The aggregate base appeared to contain little gravel and because of that it was <br />identified as Possible Aggregate Base on the boring logs. Based on our observations the aggregate <br />base or Possible Aggregate Base may not meet MN/DOT gradation specifications for Class 5 <br />aggregate base. It is possible that the Possible Aggregate base was initially placed as new or virgin <br />Class 5 aggregate base but has degraded over time due to traffic and possibly frost action. <br />Soils The borings encountered sandy subgrade soils including; poorly graded sand and poorly <br />graded sand with silt which correspond to the ASTM Classifications SP and SP-SM, respectively. <br />7 <br />