My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/23/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 11/23/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:19:12 PM
Creation date
1/11/2022 4:13:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/23/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
671
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner VanScoy asked if there is rationale between the 35 feet and 45 feet mentioned in <br />the case. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the berm will range from three to four feet and therefore <br />some properties would have more of a berm than others. She stated that because of that some <br />people would not get the full benefit of the berm and therefore an additional ten feet was added. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked how many times an outlot has been used for transitioning in the <br />past. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that the developments are handled on a case -by -case <br />basis. She stated that some have been deeded to neighbors, some have been done under easements, <br />and the outlot has been introduced as a new tool. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he did not recall something like this situation. He stated that <br />creating a 45-foot outlot and asking the developer to provide the additional space has taken away <br />some of the lot space. He noted that previously that transition area would have been the whole lot <br />with an easement. He stated that perhaps that ordinance should be revisited. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that in attempting to address one enforcement issue, <br />another issue has arisen. She agreed that it would be appropriate to review the ordinance in the <br />future. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that there will be a similar issue any time there are 80-foot lots or <br />larger abutting a new development. <br />Chairperson Bauer agreed that it would be appropriate to review this ordinance. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that staff would have time to review that as there are not <br />any anticipated developments in the near future that would require transitioning. She noted that <br />these calculations are estimates based on where a home could be placed on a lot and estimated a <br />distance of 30 to 40 feet between the back of the home to the edge of the outlot. She noted that <br />because the outlot is a shared greenspace amenity, there would be a reduced setback for items <br />placed in a backyard. <br />Citizen Input <br />Paul Tabone, Lennar, stated that they have been working with staff and ensured there is sufficient <br />space in the backyards for decks or porches. He stated that they will be cognizant of that as they <br />continue to bring the development to fruition. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked if the property owners would be made aware that the berm is not their <br />property, and whether there would be something in place to ensure subsequent landowners are <br />aware as well. <br />Planning Commission/ September 23, 2021 <br />Page 5 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.