My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/23/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 11/23/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:19:12 PM
Creation date
1/11/2022 4:13:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/23/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
671
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Howell asked if the developer is responsible for any improvements other than to <br />173rd Avenue. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl replied, yes. As a part of the resolution, the developer would be <br />responsible for improvements on Nowthen Boulevard and Variolite Street as recommended in the <br />traffic study. <br />Councilmember Howell referenced page two and number three (iii) in the case where it says <br />"improvements on 173rd Avenue as recommended in the traffic study" and suggested adding an <br />addendum "as conducted by the City of Ramsey." And wherever is says "in the traffic study" add <br />"in the City of Ramsey" and make that change in the preliminary plat. <br />Motion by Councilmember Specht, seconded by Councilmember Howell, to adopt Resolution #21- <br />319 to complete a traffic study with a not -to -exceed amount of $15,000 and to table consideration <br />of Resolution #21-309 until the January 11, 2022 meeting. <br />Further Discussion: <br />Councilmember Riley commented that the traffic study would indicate how the roads need to be <br />reconfigured but questioned if the layout of the plat would need to change based on the traffic <br />study. Councilmember Riley asked if different aspects need to be changed, how would they <br />incorporate paying for them, noting that maybe they will find adjustments have to be made to have <br />traffic go in a different way, which would impact the road. He wanted to ensure they have accurate <br />information before making a full decision. Mayor Kuzma expressed concern that two traffic <br />studies have already been done, they have been reviewed by WSB and also Bolton and Menk. He <br />felt it would be a waste of money to redo the study because it would likely have the same results <br />that are reviewed by the same people. Mayor Kunza indicated he would not be giving his support. <br />Councilmember Heineman commented that the Council has an obligation to public safety and if <br />there are alterations that need to be made, it makes sense that they do it this way. He will be giving <br />his support. Councilmember Riley commented that there are two items in the motion so he won't <br />be giving his support. City Administrator Ulrich recommended having two separate motions for <br />the sake of clarity. <br />Substitute motion by Councilmember Specht, seconded by Councilmember Heineman, to adopt <br />Resolution #21-319 to complete a traffic study with a not -to -exceed amount of $15,000. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Specht, Heineman, Musgrove, Woestehoff, <br />Howell, and Riley. Voting No: Mayor Kuzma. <br />Motion by Councilmember Specht, seconded by Councilmember Howell, to table Resolution #21- <br />309 until the January 11, 2022 meeting. <br />Further Discussion: <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented he understood the intent of the motion but asked that the <br />motion be withdrawn so they can vote on Resolution #21-23 first. City Administrator Ulrich <br />City Council / November 9, 2021 <br />Page 15 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.