My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/14/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 12/14/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:20:31 PM
Creation date
1/11/2022 4:19:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
12/14/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Information from the Metropolitan Council: <br />I wanted to provide you with the Andover example of reduced density in specific circumstances <br />(typically for infill developments in the MUSA). Please bear in mind that we required these areas to be <br />mapped, and we needed associated acreages to determine the affect on overall community density. If <br />the City adds acreage or needs to amend the map to show new locations, this will require an <br />amendment so that we can ascertain the affect on overall community density. <br />Andover Example <br />Urban Residential Low (URL) district and the Transitional Residential (TR) district at the time of <br />preliminary plat application may qualify for a reduction in minimum density requirements. If a property <br />meets three (3) or more of the criteria listed below, the City Council may approve a decrease in the <br />minimum density requirements provided the proposed density does not fall below 1.75 units per acre: <br />A. Adequate sanitary sewer or water capacity does not exist to develop the property at the <br />minimum density. <br />B. Previous subdivision of adjacent properties has provided limited access which restricts <br />development potential. <br />C. Meeting the minimum density would not be feasible due to the existence of poor soils, <br />wetlands, floodplain, topography, hydrology or other limiting environmental condition. <br />D. Property is located within a Shoreland District, Scenic River District, Wellhead Protection Area, <br />or Drinking Water Supply Management Area due to State requirements towards limiting impacts <br />to the above noted items. <br />E. For infill type developments, the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood would not <br />support development of the property at the minimum density. <br />The City is aware of several properties that may meet three of the five criteria above and has identified <br />these areas on Figure 2.4A. Figure 2.4A is for planning purposes only to illustrate the potential <br />applicability of these criteria. Ultimate determination of applicability of these criteria will be at the City <br />Council's discretion and upon site plan review. <br />will try to find some more examples. Basically, the City can opt for a reduction in the current LDR land <br />use category, but these acreages will need to be provided and mapped in the Future Land Use map or <br />similar to be included in the 2040 Plan. The criteria above are by no means required, but we will need to <br />have the acreages and area(s) mapped. Another approach would be the creation of a new land use <br />category to allow for these lower densities. My advice would be that the Council should consider <br />mechanisms (as above) to limit the use of these reductions to ensure that developments come in at or <br />above 3.0dua on average. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.