Laserfiche WebLink
Associate Planner Geisler advised there are access points at Nowthen Boulevard, and at the <br />outlot, adding that the sidewalk will need to be moved to the other side of the street. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked what the two outlots were for if they are not for density transitioning. <br /> <br />Mr. l'etcrson advised he has been working with some of the neighboring homeowners to develop <br />their lots soon after this one. He stated those outlots are there to help facilitate their <br />subdivisions. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he will leave it to Staff to address the outlots in Block 5 and Block 6 on <br />thc eastern cdge of the plat. He added that Block 10, Lots 1 through 6 and 16 also need to be <br />looked at; all are adjacent to people who spoke tonight, but all are not noted in the Staff Review <br />I~etter. I tc asked if there is an impact on drainage related to Mr. Smith's property. <br /> <br />Mr. I'assc indicated there is no problem. He stated the way the lots are lined up they are <br />proposing a swale down into a catch basin on their property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked what they are proposing to do with lots by the newly proposed <br />l'oads. <br /> <br />Mr. I'ctcrson showed how the lots would be configured if the street were allowed to be stubbed, <br />versus thc cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Chairl)ers(m Nixt stated he feels that limits the ability to property transition. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson noted that it would be going from six lots to three lots that would abut <br />thc adjacent property. <br /> <br />C, ommissioner Johnson asked if they would require Garnet be updated. <br /> <br />City Enginccr Jankowski stated that the problem is if there is any indication that the homeowners <br />would like to subdivide, and have sewer and water, they would have to tear up the road again. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked how necessary the 166th Avenue alignment is, noting that Mr. <br />l'eterson stated it would adversely affect two homeowners. <br /> <br />Mr. l'ctcrson stated that either alignment may require some condemnation. <br /> <br />(:omm i ssioncr Johnson asked how critical it is to put 167th Avenue through in the next five to ten <br />y~3al'S. <br /> <br />City l';nginccr Jankowski stated it is not very critical in that time frame. <br /> <br />Mr. I'ctcrson stated that all of the property necessary is not purchased at this point, but as he laid <br />out thc case to the City Council and showed them the proposal, there was considerable support <br />/'or thc 166th Avenue alignment. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/August 8, 2005 <br /> Page 8 of 26 <br /> <br /> <br />