My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/28/2021 - Work Session
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/28/2021 - Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:48:28 AM
Creation date
1/31/2022 10:59:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Work Session
Document Date
10/28/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Anderson stated that his concern is related to safety. He noted that if drivers are <br />taking their eyes off the road to look at a sign, it causes a safety concern. He did not see the need <br />for additional distractions until the stoplights are taken off Highway 10. <br />Commissioner Gengler commented that there are digital billboards throughout the metro and <br />therefore she is unable to make the connection that the sign is responsible for accidents. She stated <br />that perhaps fewer signs be allowed within The COR if these larger signs are going to be allowed. <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that The COR Framework is specific to what is allowed, but <br />the City continues to issue variances outside of that framework. He stated that the monuments <br />were meant to communicate what is within The COR. He expects that this ordinance will pass <br />even though he does not like the idea of allowing billboards in Ramsey. He commented that <br />billboards are a distraction and, in his opinion, are not worth looking at and detract from the look <br />of the community. He stated that he does like using a CUP as that would allow additional review <br />of each proposed location. He commented that perhaps eight seconds is too low for message <br />duration. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that she would recommend ten seconds. <br />Commissioner Walker commented that people are often caught up on how short eight or ten <br />seconds is when it is longer than it seems. He noted that by the time a driver sees the sign, they <br />would only see one or two messages before they pass the sign. <br />Chairperson Bauer reviewed the consensus items from the Commission related to this ordinance. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that based on the comments he would suggest taking this item <br />off the Consent Agenda for the regular meeting to allow those opposed to vote against the request. <br />2.02: Consider Ordinance #21-18 Allowing Accessory Dwelling Units on Single -Family <br />Residential Properties <br />Planning Technician McCann reviewed the staff report. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl noted that staff attempted to make this as simple as possible. <br />Chairperson Bauer suggested a language change. <br />Commissioner Dunaway stated that the ordinance states that an accessory dwelling unit would be <br />allowed for properties over 2.5 acres. He noted that there is also language related to a garage <br />conversion and found that confusing as to whether properties under 2.5 acres would qualify. <br />Chairperson Bauer replied that only properties 2.5 acres or larger would be eligible. <br />Commissioner Dunaway commented that in the previous discussion he recalls discussion about <br />elderly family members that may require direct care and whether the regulations would be too <br />restrictive. <br />Planning Commission/ October 28, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.